

| Subject: | Re: confusing subject lines |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:26:06 -0400 |
At 05:11 PM 6/22/2012, Dave Mcneely wrote: >So, if what you guys are saying is correct, this should come to me >under the old subject line, something about using the "reply" >function? hasn't seemed to be that way before. but what do I >know? maybe not much. I certainly got access to the subject line, >and changed it, though Jim says otherwise. There is a thread-id function in email headers that most people don't know about because most email client programs ignore it. It looks like this: In-Reply-To: <CAFnDXk11B0RxgTk+kdsCJGfQuxsbQTW-gjWah4J11ji6hHhxag@mail.gmail.com> OR In-Reply-To: <73467F28C4E04568851A8EBE3B59A7A4@customerPC> The Bat is a good example of a mail client program that believes in it. It allows you to sort messages by thread, but it doesn't pay attention to changes in the Subject: header. A long time ago when I was first setting up to use gmail (I use it primarily as a mail cache and an outgoing mail server I can reach from anywhere, but never from the web interface), the web interface specifically said that if you edited the subject line it would start a new thread. Apparently they've changed their policy on that. And if gmail is paying attention to threads I imagine it will be much more in the public consciousness than before. Yours, David
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »