

| Subject: | Re: Friday NVC-MGB engine that rebuilds itself |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:22:06 -0500 |
Allard? Jim On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans <scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > The carbed version of the XJ6 is pretty nasty all right. > The EFI version has to be better. > > I once saw the 'climate control' unit in that carbed XJ6 my friend owned. > .. > a huge box about 10 X 1- inches, with big gears in it ... > just impossibly large and mechanical ... > Humorous, how archaic looking it was. > > Got to give big points for the design of the XJ6 though. > Read a whole long story one time about how Sir William Lions had a great eye > for just the right line . > That article said he'd take his best panel beaters out behind the shop and > start shaping metal until it looked just right. > Some of the best looking cars ever made .. > the 'feline' looking Jags of those days. > > Shapes gain in their purity as the years go by. You could not change one > line by a quarter inch and make that car shape better..so 'pure and honest' > is the shape. > � Same for other cars too ..the 300SL for example...just visual perfection. > > here's another quiz ....matter of opinion of course, and .. > what is the All Time Best post-war American car design ? > The best looking, most iconic, most 'pure american' car design or shape ? > And sexy too. > Especially if counting only cars after WWII. > > Scott > > > > On 6/29/2012 2:23 PM, Jim Felder wrote: > > Scott; > > RE the XKE: that would have been an easier mistake (than an MGB) to > make since both cars had the "backwards" opening hoods. Never saw an > XKE engine with a dual carb setup either, though my wife's POS XJ6 had > those two sorry unadjustable smog-bergs on essentially the same > engine. > > But if one were smart enough not to have fooled with any of that junk, > one wouldn't know, right? > > Jim > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Mike Miller <mwmiller6@att.net> wrote: > > But it still might be an MG B engine. I believe it would bolt right up > to a spitfire. > > Mike > > > On Jun 29, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote: > > heck.. > if they're gonna get the sport car brand completely wrong why didn't > they call it a Jaguar XKE ? ! > Hell..why not call it a 300SL Gullwing then ! > > I love that Peter Garrilson ( last name spelling ? ) � �of Flying > magazine wrote this ... > > "There is no law against technical descriptions or words that are > imprecise -- unfortunately." > > No kidding. > I SWEAR ....it was never like this before everyone had a computer. > Back then �people thought when they wrote, though I tend to idealize > things I appreciate deeply �- like thoughtful writing. > > > On 6/29/2012 11:12 AM, Jim Felder wrote: > > That's a Spitfire! > > Jim > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM, neil n <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > > Excellent ending! > > But did he replace his fuel lines? � �;) > > Neat. Thanks > > > Neil. > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@gmail.com > > wrote: > > From one of my other lists. I need to train my WBX to do this: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daVDrGsaDME > <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daVDrGsaDME&feature=youtu.be> > &feature=youtu.be > > > > Stuart > > > -- > Neil n > > 65 kb image Myford Ready For Assembly �http://tinyurl.com/64sx4rp > > '88 Slate Blue Westy to be named. > > '81 VanaJetta 2.0 "Jaco" �http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/ > > Vanagon VAG Gas I4/VR Swap Google Group: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/vanagons-with-vw-inline-4-cylinder-gas-engines > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »