

| Subject: | Re: EPA and Vanagon Emissions |
| From: | Tom Hargrave |
| Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:07:33 -0500 |
Joy, 1 kg does not equal 1 liter. Also diesel emits more per liter because there are more BTU's per liter of diesel than gasoline. Compare kg's of carbon per 1000 miles or 1000 KM's driven in like vehicles and diesel comes out less polluting. Thanks, Tom Hargrave www.stir-plate.com www.towercooler.com www.kegkits.com www.grow-sun.com -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM] On Behalf Of Joy Hecht Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:49 PM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: EPA and Vanagon Emissions That's great news, that the court upheld EPA regs on GHG emissions! It got lost under all the talk about the Supreme Court decisions. The articles don't say anything about regulating auto emissions - they are focused only on power plants. But for those concerned about GHGs emitted by your vans, the only way to reduce them is to consume less gasoline. GHG emissions are a linear function of gallons of gas burned. According to http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/transport/fuelguide/environment.ht ml, regular gas emits 2.3 kg of carbon per liter burned and diesel emits 2.7 kg of carbon per liter. (Don't ask me how the weight of the emissions can be greater than the weight of the fuel burned, it doesn't make sense to me either!) Burn less gas and you emit less fuel. So anything that enables you to consume less gas will reduce your climate change impact. Less total gas, that is - if you get better gas mileage and then drive more because you spend less per mile on gas, you aren't reducing your emissions! Joy ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 2433/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »