

| Subject: | Re: Dometic failure on propane, one time |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:37:09 -0500 |
David, all your reasoning makes sense. One question about VW and Westfalia's intentions regarding use (which either of us can only infer from instructions given in published materials): If the expectation was (and I include Dometic in the expectation, since it is their machine) that the refrigerator run on gas underway, then what is the D.C. mode there for? I always close the external valve when moving. And I wonder why the stove valves do not have a positive click stop position for off, one that would resist any unintentional opening of the valve. Seems only a reasonable precaution. But I'm not an engineer, nor do I play one on T.V. (or in techno babble videos). Your idea of modifying the refrigerator door to expose the controls is interesting. I have wondered why the controls were not made accessible with the door closed. Maybe they should be behind a panel that opens without opening the refrigerator door. Sincerely, mcneely ---- David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote: > At 10:02 AM 8/15/2012, Dave Mcneely wrote: > >What down time would you suggest is reasonable for switching? When > >I follow the fifteen minute rule, the fridge seems > > If you really insist on flipping back and forth, instead of just > running the fire continuously as 90% (figure pulled out of my hat) of > Volks do and the fridge was designed for* and VW/Westfalia were > perfectly happy with until some corporate lawyer in charge of > preempting lawsuits above all else came along and stamped "Dry clean > only" on your manual - do as I did and open up the outer door in way > of the control panel so you can reach things without opening > it. That will leave the upper rim of the door rather thin so you'll > want to rout out two windows with a pillar in the middle. That's the > benefit of hindsight - I put in a dowel to support the middle. > > *I seriously contend that there is *no* measurable increment of > safety gained by not using the flame underway *unless* the external > supply valve is closed. If the valve is open, the significant danger > is the exposed position and easy unlock of the stove knobs which can > flood the van with propane. The open supply valve itself is of > little-to-no consequence in an accident, since the POL spud attached > to the regulator by which it attaches to the supply valve is of the > type (is required to be of the type) known as "excess-flow." This > opaque terminology means that if either the regulator is knocked off > or its output tubing damaged and allowed to flow freely, an internal > valve inside the POL spud will close and seal the tank. The fridge > flame is sealed up in a heavy-gauge steel can with access only to the > outside; and any conceivable leak in the flue system which might > allow gas flowing from a stove burner to enter and ignite will only > be a danger when the vehicle is stationary, because any wind will > then blow the flame out. This last fact allows me to sincerely argue > that operating the flame underway is the safest possible practice, > since it will automatically detect any leaks in the flue system that > could conceivably cause a danger while camping. > > Yours, > David > -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »