

| Subject: | Re: Low compression, more test results-busaid inying used vans! |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Sat, 8 Sep 2012 08:53:49 -0500 |
How many of us, except for those who are able to do all the work on their vans themselves, don't have a $20k (or more) van? Wife and I now call ours the $1M van. Even those who do the work themselves, if they put in one of the engines sold by rebuilders, end up with a figure something like you mentioned. Take a look at Larry's RoadHaus van payout, and that was 10 years ago and doesn't include maintenance since. mcneely ---- Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote: > As I have said in the past the most important part of purchasing a used > vehicle is to find out why it is/was for sale. For some reason the > past/current owner no longer wants it! > > Since you only had this a few months you now know one reason. I doubt this > "just" happened. Depending on what you paid and how you go about the > conversion and then all the other stuff to follow you too may soon have that > $20K Camper. > > Dennis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Stuart MacMillan > Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 10:52 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Low compression, more test results > > Well, for those who have been following by email thread about making the > mistake of checking compression on my 140k mile original engine > (90-150-100-130) Ive done some more tests. > > > > 1. Valves were zero lash or 1 turn in, no valve noise, timing dead on > > 2. Manifold vacuum is 12 Hg with ±1 tick (should be steady 17-21) > > 3. No detectable vacuum leaks (propane test), all vacuum hoses new. > > 4. 22% leak down on #1, could hear leakage all three places, but > exhaust and intake were louder than the dipstick, with the exhaust being the > worst. (Should have used the decibel meter on my iPhone, but I didnt want > to get it greasy ;-) ). Didnt bother testing the others after this result. > > 5. Does not burn oil (in 1000 miles at least) Plugs that came in it > were clean. > > 6. PO installed reman AFM recently > > 7. Idles smooth (as any of them anyway), runs well, no coolant leaks, > but has poor acceleration and poor gas mileage (~15 mpg highway). > > > > Looks like its got some leaking valves. No surprise this rig is worn out, I > assumed it was, but I could drive it home at least. I hope I can get a few > thousand more miles out of it so I can save some dough for a conversion! > > > > Sometimes ignorance is bliss, but never for long. I waited until after my > planned summer trips to check the engine condition, so I was blissfully > ignorant on purpose. Im still planning a couple of fall trips nearby > though. What the hell, Ive got AAA premier. > > > > Stuart > > 85 Westy, purchased in May -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »