

| Subject: | Re: Fluid Filming the underbody of van |
| From: | Alistair Bell |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:26:16 -0700 |
some super exciting pics of glistening underbody here: http://shufti.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/vanagon-fluid-film-on-underbody-pics/ I had some issues with the first gun I used. Was not pulling the FF up the feed hose (2 ft) consistently. It produced a very fine fog but in retrospect it might have been a good thing. Second gun I used was better, really sprayed well. "spraying the lanolin" is now an official euphemism. alistair On 2012-10-13, at 6:56 PM, Bill MacLachlan wrote: > And I used up my first aerosol can this afternoon on the underside of the > new (89, dove grey) westy. And here's me thinking the brown colour was dust > dripping off from the last trip ! > > BIll M > 82 I4 yellow > 89 waterboxer westy blue! > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> I managed to spray some Fluid Film on the underbody of the van today. I >> bought a gallon of the stuff a while back (up until now I had been buying >> spray cans of the stuff). It is a nice feeling, and (to me) a nice smell to >> have the underside of van glistening with the stuff. >> >> prelim pics (no underbody shots yet) here: >> >> >> http://shufti.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/vanagon-fluid-film-doesnt-taste-that-bad/ >> >> alistair >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »