My email wasn't meant to offend anyone.

It's usually considered bad form to reply to digest mode as list headers
are mangled and don't follow the conversation chain when viewed in a
client browser.

There are all sorts of indentation problems with multiple quoted
sources, again when trying to reply to these things.

In my opinion using digest mode is analogous to a google search. You're
looking to digest information not necessarily interact with it.

And it wasn't meant to imply that people who use digest mode are in any
way outside of the community.

Again, digest mode is a way of consuming information. Not interacting
with it.

I apologize if I offended anyone. I can assure you that wasn't my intention.

Cheers,
Harry

On 03/05/2013 06:01 PM, David Beierl wrote:
> At 03:24 PM 3/5/2013, Scott Daniel - Turbovans wrote:
>> top-posting here ..
>> re :
>>> It sucks for people who are in digest mode, but by the very nature of
>>> getting the messages in digest mode you aren't looking to have a
>>> interactive conversation.
>>
>> Thank you for saying that !   the 'interactive conversation part.
>>
>> and I thought that was the whole idea too !
>> S.
>
> Gee, you guys are feeling heartless today...are the digest users
> feeling the love?  My old mammy always told me to keep my words soft
> and sweet in case I had to spend a lot of time eating them...so far I
> believe I haven't had to eat over half, trying to keep to that
> standard in my declining years.
>
> Yours,
> David