

| Subject: | Re: 2.1 in a 85........ |
| From: | Paul |
| Date: | Mon, 4 Mar 2013 19:36:00 -0800 |
My lips are sealed as much as they can be as I smile too On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Old Volks Home <oldvolkshome@gmail.com>wrote: > Tell them NOTHING. This is where you keep your mouth shut and I've > learned to do that as a 3rd generation native Kalifornian. I have > been running a 2.1 in my 84 Westy Ole Putt since 1997 in Kalifornia, > always passed with the 1.9 Digijet and emissions. > > http://www.oldvolkshome.com/19to21.htm > > -- > Jim Thompson > 84 GL 1.9 "Gloria" > 84 Westfalia 2.1 "Ole Putt" > 72 411 Station Wagon "Pug" > 75 914 1.8 "Nancy" > Full Timing From March 1999 To January 2012 > oldvolkshome@gmail.com > http://www.oldvolkshome.com > Find me on Facebook: > http://www.facebook.com/people/Jim-Thompson/100000710343835 > *********************************** > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Paul <wognacious@gmail.com> wrote: > > Will having a 2.1L in my 1985 Westy, which originally had the 1.9L create > > problems when I go to smog it next year? I just left a CA Test Only > Station > > after getting my 95 T-100 smogged and I was talking with one of the > tech's > > and I mentioned my engine swap and that I would be bringing my Vanagon in > > soon for it's next smog test and he expressed some concerns with > > confiiciting compression and other stuff in going from a 1.9 to a 2.1 in > > 85. Is he full of it or right on it? > > TIA, > > Paul in Tracy >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »