thanks for the clarification, David

---- David Beierl <dbeierl@ATTGLOBAL.NET> wrote:
> At 09:56 AM 3/19/2013, Dave Mcneely wrote:
> >Hmmmm........ .  I don't mean this in a disrespectful way, Scott.  I
> >respect your knowledge, much superior to mine, of the Vanagon and
> >how it works.  That said, it has been my experience, mostly, that
> >the VW engineers did almost everything with reason.  If they vented
> >a location, I suspect the location needed vented.  Now, I may be
> >wrong, and I realize that many modifications are made to the Vanagon
> >without compromising function, and a few (eliminating or changing
> >plastic fitting on the primary fuel line for example) improve it.
>
> Dave, what Scott was saying is that the location for the third vent
> doesn't exist in the particular engine conversion (2.5 liter
> five-cylinder inline) that Dick has in that Syncro.
>
> Yours,
> David

--
David McNeely