

| Subject: | Re: I hate to get a tire discussion |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:34:27 -0400 |
At 08:23 PM 4/23/2013, Dave Mcneely wrote: >the U.S. call for an LT tire on a 14" wheel, and so trailers are >where the market is, but that the tire is sold elsewhere for use on >vans. Is the same thing true of the Hankook RA08? On the Hankook-Europe site they're listed under light truck. Description thus: ><http://www.hankooktire-eu.com/uk/tyres/tyre-presenter-single-view/view/singleView.html?aoetirepresenter%5Boffset%5D=0&aoetirepresenter%5Btire%5D=30&aoetirepresenter%5Bback%5D=214&cHash=62ee97d7c4043177940da8a2250e0afc>http://www.hankooktire-eu.com/uk/tyres/tyre-presenter-single-view/view/singleView.html?aoetirepresenter%5Boffset%5D=0&aoetirepresenter%5Btire%5D=30&aoetirepresenter%5Bback%5D=214&cHash=62ee97d7c4043177940da8a2250e0afc > After learning the hard way about passenger-car tires, and experiencing the better handling and greatly reduced sway from shifting to Michelin MX tires (and then successively MXL and Agilis 80 as the others became obsolete) -- the Hankook RA08 behave just fine in ordinary use, and are a good deal better than the Michelins in snow. I don't carry 300# of sand in the back any more, because the RA08 are better without it than the Michelins were with. Yrs, d
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »