

| Subject: | Re: Aftermarket replacement fuel tanks. |
| From: | J Stewart |
| Date: | Sun, 12 May 2013 18:19:29 +0000 |
Maybe one reason VW never redesigned the tank was that if you had a watercooled Vanagon with the gas heater option (as a previous Vanagon of mine had) then that valley was still necessary for the duct work from the gas heater (damn I loved that heater!) and it also made resealing the tank a lot more challenging! Jeff Stewart ----- Original Message ----- > I got one from Van Café last year and it works fine. Came in a large > box > with all the holes and connections properly covered. The only trick is > to > adjust the tabs slightly on the sender hole so the sender can properly > twist > in with a new 0-ring (which you should get). Too bad they introduced > the > Vanagon with the aircooled engine. If they had the waterboxer ready > there > could have been a larger tank without such a deep valley for a heat > duct > between the camel humps. > Stuart > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > Behalf Of > Steve Cotsford > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 6:31 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Aftermarket replacement fuel tanks. > Has anyone replaced their fuel tank with one of the aftermarket tanks > I see > from various suppliers. I have seen for for as little as $98, > shipping > not included. I guess they are made in China and do not have the > innards > the same as the oem. > I am considering replacing mine as a precautionary measure, If not > now, > when I do my planned engine swap. > Thanks, Steve=
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »