

| Subject: | Re: Friday free post, California beach fires to be taboo? |
| From: | Stuart MacMillan |
| Date: | Fri, 31 May 2013 08:38:41 -0700 |
The rich folks in NY have their own beach problems: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/nyregion/as-boozy-invaders-hit-beach-hampt ons-sound-snooki-alert.html?pagewanted=all Late last summer fires were banned in all the state parks in WA too, but for (mostly non-existent) wild fire risk. Stuart -----Original Message----- From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Ben Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 7:44 AM To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: Friday free post, California beach fires to be taboo? Makes one wonder what the New York Times is doing publishing articles about California beaches. Don't they have their own beaches to 'beach' about? So far, we are still keeping our fire rings in Northern California. Just waiting around for the next BurningVan. :-) BenT Van-O-Rama #13 coming in September On May 31, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@COX.NET> wrote: > Anybody seen this? What is the world coming to? Actually, it may be necessary in the urban, air challenged setting, but good grief! > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/us/pollution-concerns-could-douse-californ ia-beach-fires.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130531&_r=0 > > mcneely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »