

| Subject: | Re: Good customer service experience, Rotopax |
| From: | Rocket J Squirrel |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Jul 2013 05:52:16 -0700 |
"Now let's take this container and place it so that that the sun can hit the large surface area of the side. This way we can heat it up even faster. If we vent enough the gasoline will be gone. Oh, and lets place this container outside and over our heads. Just a whole bunch of bad ideas." Yeah well I'm not the brightest one in the classroom. How about let's discuss better ways to pack spare gasoline? I personally can't afford an expensive rear rack to mount a jerrycan. -- Jack "Rocket j Squirrel" Elliott 1984 Westfalia, auto trans, Bend, Ore. On 07/08/2013 10:20 PM, Dennis Haynes wrote: > No matter how well a container is designed some good judgment has to > be made in how it is used particularly with flammable liquids. There > is a reason that propane tanks can only be filled to 80% capacity. > That is a good choice for any liquid container that will be exposed > to temperature changes and in particular if any heat sources are > involved. That is also the reason that the Vanagon fuel system has > expansion tanks and why vehicle fillers are in the side of the tank > so there is always some air space somewhere. As for venting, that is > only a temporary fix when a heat source like sitting in the sun is > applied. The vapor pressure will be determined by the liquid and its > temperature. Since gasoline can make enough vapor to burn at ~-40 > just imagine what it can do heated to 120+. Now let's take this > container and place it so that that the sun can hit the large surface > area of the side. This way we can heat it up even faster. If we vent > enough the gasoline will be gone. Oh, and lets place this container > outside and over our heads. Just a whole bunch of bad ideas. > > Dennis >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »