

| Subject: | Re: Rantworthy '85 Westy ad? |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:51:15 -0500 |
Well, I agree that our campers sell for more than the price listed in the dealer's guides. But, using asking price to convince insurance adjusters would be a stretch, so far as the adjuster is concerned. The adjuster would want proof that those prices are realized, not just asked. GoWesty has a program where they will work with you and the adjuster to get a proper adjustment in case of a total. Of course, GoWesty wants salvage rights. Does anyone have actual experience with getting a proper adjustment from an insurance company? I continue to carry full coverage on my camper, since the cost is pretty low, but have doubts that I will, if needed, realize a reasonable settlement. And of course, given my absolutely perfect driving skills ( ;-0 ) have a lot more likelihood of having to deal with someone else's insurance adjuster than mine. mcneely ---- Roger Whittaker <rogerwhitt1@gmail.com> wrote: > dear noticed > > that "I noticed that the top does not seem to fit properly." ... is most > likely a sloppy job of packing the canvas into place - > it is also very likely the patch required for the top as noted in the > description - will multiply in size and or number every time one of the non > westie sorts opens and closes the top with out regard for the canvas - > > I think it is great to see retail asking price up where it belongs at > another dealership besides go westy - i suggest that all those who like to > have records to show insurance adjusters - grab a screen shot of this with > details so if you are required to justify to an adjuster advising the > writing of a 1500$ cheque - you will have some legs to stand on besides the > premium go westy stuff - > > it always surprises me when a decent vehicle is listed at retail prices - > every one points at the pictures and nit pics - then when in the event of a > wreck - hue-n-cry goes up - that adjuster offered kelly book pricing or > blue book pricing or some other invented scale that has nothing to do with > the "value" of the van - > insurance is not for value - insurance is for compensation of replacement > cost of same - i wish the van listed in Maryland was stickered at twice as > much ... > > anyway not even close to friday - for this kind of roger driven silliness > > regards > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Dave Mcneely <mcneely4@cox.net> wrote: > > > What is the "Gary Lee rear rack"? I noticed that the top does not seem to > > fit properly. It slopes slightly upward toward the front, leaving what > > appears to be a gap where it should fit against the luggage rack. mcneely > > > > ---- Stephen Grisanti <bike2vcu@YAHOO.COM> wrote: > > > Looks nice enough but is priced at the upper end of the scale by a > > Maryland dealer, and it appears to be missing most of a Gary Lee rear rack. > > I'd sure ask about that for that price. > > > > http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/mld/ctd/3933673721.html > > > > > > Stephen > > > > -- > > David McNeely > > > > > > -- > roger whittaker 604.414.6266 > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.tvthatworks.com > http://www.tvpowellriver.com > Explore printed work at: http://www.prliving.ca/ > View the growing list of video work at: > http://www.youtube.com/user/LastonLastof#g/u > http://vimeo.com/42309497 > http://www.prpeak.com/articles/2010/11/29/multimedia/video/doc4c62e5f80d228504902172.txt -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »