

| Subject: | Re: nuts vs head gasket job |
| From: | Scott Daniel |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Sep 2013 21:10:07 -0700 |
see below .. On 9/4/2013 8:45 PM, Tom Carchrae wrote: > Jim: I guess I got lucky - no coolant drips. But you make a good point > about what a crazy system that is and why it is prone to failure. > > Scott: I have tried a few blue caps. I need to make a cap tester and/or > run the van with a pressure gauge on the expansion tank when the van is > running. (Test # 2 from > http://web.archive.org/web/20050309065156/http://www.bostonengine.com/articles/waterboxes.html > ). > I've previously done a test for exhaust gasses, but no CO2 detected. I > have wanted to plumb a pressure gauge into the cooling system for some time > now - I am not brave (stupid?) enough to put it in on the dash, but I am > definitely going to rig up a temporary one to the expansion tank. > > When I bought the van, I took it to a mechanic, who said, "hey your cap is > bad, we changed it" - and he did some work on my heads, what I am not sure > although it involved valve adjustment to fix low compression. After this, > the cooling system started blowing up here and there and nearly $2k later I > was broke and annoyed and have not returned to that mechanic. I then said > screw this and have most of the work on the van myself since. I drove it > across western Canada and the cooling system blew up twice more on me - > after the first time, I changed the cap to another spare I had bought. The > second time was due to air in the radiator and a giant traffic jam (a > massive mud slide on Hwy 1) and the van actually overheated (went to ~220oC > and it was full of water) and the coolant sensor popped off - its > whereabouts are still unknown. Both times the van was pretty heat soaked > and running at slow speeds - I learned a lesson there. > > So, yeah, it is probably due. And I actually enjoy working on it, so it's > not all bad. > > Btw, are there any engine stands and hoists that are specifically designed > for working inside your van? :) IF you mean lowering the engine down to to heads in place..I just use a floor jack. Can hang it from above too ...like with 2 X 4 and chains. if it's got this history of cooling system hebbie-geebies and it's not 'basic' like an external leak, t-stat, or tired radiator .. if you've eliminated all the normal stuff, take the heads off. those small green o-rings that keep coolant away from the metal sealing rings on top of the barrels.. they go south in a few years, easily. it's an adapted air-cooled design ..it's just funky. It can't work that well long term, not like conventional all-flat 'real' head gaskets on normal engines. I figure head work and head gaskets every 80K miles....every 8 to 10 years max. I would hope you enjoy working on it. It's quite rewarding to produce a good result. Scott > > Tom > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Scott Daniel <scottdaniel@turbovans.com>wrote: > >> PS to my last post. >> Make sure it's not the blue pressure cap. Try another one. They are >> notoriously flakey sometimes. >> >> >> >> On 9/4/2013 4:37 PM, Jim Felder wrote: >> >>> The head bolts and the heads do two things simultaneously, and do only one >>> of them very well. >>> >>> They hold the aluminum ring that serves as a true head gasket; that is, >>> that gasket confines the compression gases to within the cylinder, without >>> leaking it to the outside world. The other thing that is going on is that >>> the head also squeezes a rubber gasket between the head and the water >>> jacket on the block. This is imprecise. Normally, the compression head >>> gaskets do not fail very often. That is not true of the outer water gasket >>> which is held in place by the same head bolts. Think of it s a circle >>> (actually two circles on each side) of metal, with very precise clamping >>> pressure to hold in the combustion gasses, surrounded by a rubber gasket >>> which deteriorates, holding in the coolant. >>> >>> Guess which is going to go first? >>> >>> Yep, the rubber. If your head bolts are tight enough to contain the >>> combustion gasses, but you are leaking water, you are not going to affect >>> the rubber more than a thousandths or two by tightening the already tight >>> bolts holding the compression gaskets in place. If you are leaking >>> coolant, >>> it is because your rubber gaskets have a breech somewhere, not because >>> there is not enough pressure on them. >>> >>> It always makes me feel better to go through the procedure or tightening >>> the bolts as you suggest, but, in the end, you will have to pull the heads >>> and replace the outer rubber gaskets. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Carchrae <tom@carchrae.net> wrote: >>> >>> I've put this off long enough. I got a few trips from my van this >>>> summer, >>>> but on the last day I drove it, it backed up the coolant in the reservoir >>>> (behind licence plate) three times in one day. I would pull over when >>>> the >>>> blinking low-coolant light turned on, drain the coolant out into a >>>> bottle, >>>> start the vehicle, open the hot pressurized tank, and pour the coolant >>>> back >>>> where it belonged. >>>> >>>> Yesterday I took the valve covers off and used a torque wrench to inspect >>>> the tightness of the nuts on the heads - well, all the easy to get to >>>> nuts >>>> (so all but the two behind the air intake - I have only removed the air >>>> filter box so far). >>>> >>>> I have only done one side so far, but I found one of the bolts in the >>>> centre of the head to be slightly under spec (37lb). I recall Dennis >>>> Hayes >>>> saying (email below) that this managed to solve head gasket symptoms 50% >>>> of >>>> the time if done soon enough. I doubt I have been soon enough, but how >>>> does one tell. >>>> >>>> I am prepared to do the head removal but boy would I be happy if it was >>>> as >>>> simple as tightening some nuts. Would I be overly hopeful to think that >>>> this minimal nut tightening this late would save me having to remove the >>>> heads? >>>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>> 84 Vanagon >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> One problem with relying on the sniffer tests is that they are looking >>>> for >>>> >>>>> un-burned hydrocarbons. In order for this to work in addition to the >>>>> leak >>>>> you also need a combustion failure in the leaking cylinder. While >>>>> cracked >>>>> or >>>>> loose heads may also cause a combustion issue you are in deep trouble by >>>>> the >>>>> point the sniffer tests pick it up. Keep in mind if those gasses can get >>>>> out >>>>> in some cases coolant can get into the cylinders. Antifreeze into the >>>>> cylinders and then into the oil can cause some real damage. Long before >>>>> antifreeze in the oil is visible the stuff becomes extremely corrosive >>>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>>> can quickly destroy bearings along with crank and cam surfaces. It can >>>>> >>>> also >>>> >>>>> destroy pistons by blowing out the tops and destroying the ring lands. >>>>> >>>>> If the engine has ever been overheated, (even before a rebuild) or has >>>>> >>>> had >>>> >>>>> the heads off for any reason loose heads can be the cause. I probably >>>>> >>>> have >>>> >>>>> a >>>>> better than 50-50 success rate in fixing these issues just be retourqing >>>>> the >>>>> heads if the problem has not been left so long that the head seals >>>>> >>>> (inners) >>>> >>>>> or the tops of the cylinders have burned or pitted away. >>>>> >>>>> Dennis >>>>> >>>>>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »