Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Re: Early Friday Post--don't open until September 6
From:Rob
Date:Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:19:01 -0500

Wow... these words strung loosely together by you are not saying
anything to me, I have to read them... But to answer your question,
no I don't read newspapers or car magazines. Well I will look at the
head lines as I walk by & if it really interests me I'll look that
story up on-line. I did read a copy of Rolling Stone cover to cover
the other day (just to see if I could).
As a matter of fact I check out 3 or 4 new sources on line most every
day and none of them mention the DEF I see at the truck stop for
$2.79 a gallon.
If I needed DEF I'm sure I'd have heard about it, or I would have
asked a email list of knowledgeable people what it was... my guess
was diesel exhaust fluid and I don't have a diesel right now...

There are no dumb questions.

I'm willing to bet if your VW needs DEF you are aware of it, maybe
not if someone else installed the diesel in your Vanagon (vanagon
content) but you could always go to the TDI-conversion list & ask
them.  ( http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/TDI-conversion/info )

Rob
vwrobb@gmail.com

At  9/5/2013 07:49 PM,Scott Daniel wrote:
>lol.
>just teasin' ya about not knowing about diesel exhaust fluid.
>
>Perhaps some people don't read 'car news' ..like in regular major
>newspapers ...like reviews of new models there, or car magazines.
>In those venues urea fluid to reduce diesel emissions is pretty old news.
>
>
>I do know people that almost never read, sadly, and I'm not saying you
>are one of them.
>I think reading itself increases intelligence. Even if someone reads
>about knitting, it makes their brain work better, IMO.
>especially on Fridaes !
>
>vanagon content ...a hyper modern engine like that Chevy one probably
>'can' be put in a Vanagon ..though not easily, I suspect, from the
>electronics aspect. Possible I'm sure............As for easy....., I
>wouldn't think so especially.
>
>the displacement is pretty too small, right ?  I could google it of course.