

| Subject: | Re: Arduino and Vanagons |
| From: | JRodgers |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:20:37 -0600 |
Wow! Scott. That Treatise is a HUGE step in helping me understand our trusty steeds engine operation. Thanks for posting! John On 11/17/2013 12:32 AM, Scott Daniel wrote: > hi John.... > what is 'injection discharge' ?? > got me there. > > let's try this .... > air is being drawn through the intake manifold and past the open intake > valve while that cylinder's piston is going down, drawing in the air ( > which is 'pushed' by atmospheric pressure , as you say ) .. > > IF it was a timed sequential egine ...the injector would squirt right at > the intake valve area ...and during the intake phase . Subaru's are > really, really neat that way. Each injector is 'twin'd' > .............that is there are two separate sprays coming out of the > injector together..each stream of fuel aimed right at it's nearby ( > about an inch or so ) small intake valve ( 4 valves per cyldiner , 2 > intake, 2 exhuast ). > And that all makes perfect and logical sense. > For the ecu to do that , it has to know where the crankshaft and pistons > are , which it knows by there being a camshaft and crankshaft positon > sensor on each of those . > There's no distributor ....the timing can not be adjusted ..the ecu > knows completely what's going on, and fires the spark plugs and > injectors at exactly the right time. Ignition advance is taken care of > inside the ECU, completely electronicaly. ( it's also Knock Sensor > equipped ignitIon . ) > > on a waterboxer..compared to that , it's really crude. > The ECU know the engine is turning from seeing the igntion pulses from > the Hall Sender in the distributor. > It also knows what the rpm is. > It does not have any idea what cylinder is being fired or where say > Cylinder 1 is in the 4 Stoke Cycle. > > inputs are ........let's see.. > rpm, > coolant temp, > intake air temp, > air flow meter flapper door and sweeper position on that circuit under > the cover on the AFM. > > ( I don't know if the ECU can sense 'rate of change of throttle > position'. I suspect not on Difijet and Digifant. > One some systems ....say early volvo EFI ...there's a a fairly > sophisticate throttle position switch ( and no AFM ) . The Ecu can see > throttle position, and also 'rate of change' of throttle position, and > it uses that info to richen up mixture when the throttle is opened more > ..exacty analongous to the Accelerator Pump Jet in a carb. ) ( further > below I'll say what waterboxer EFI uses for an 'accelerator pump jet ) > > Throttle wise...wbxr ecu's know if the throttle is closed, or if it's > at WOT ...and if it's not at either of those extremes. > Those are the imputs that come to mind right now. > oh.....here's another one ..'Start Signal' ..the ecu knows when the > engine is being cranked to start ..to put in extra fuel I imagine. > (earlier systems had a Cold Start Injector , pre Digijet and digifant > ..thankfully our waterboxers don't use one ) > > and oxygen sensor of course...that comes into play after a short period > of running. It fine tunes the mixture. They'll run quite well without > an 02 input, but having one is better of course. > > with that information .... > the ecu figures out how long to hold the injectors open. > if the fuel pressure is right ...the right amount of fuel will be injected. > The ecu has no idea what the fuel pressure is. > if the fuel pressure is low say ..........for a given amount of injector > open time...less fuel will be injected. > The ecu will not even know it, except maybe slightly from the 02 sensor. > There won't be any codes set or anything like that of course. > The ecu will just 'try' to do what it can with what it has to work > with. Fuel pressure is regulated by the fuel pressure regulator of > course...a purely mechanical device. > > OK ..the 'enrichment when opening the throttle' ....the fuel pressure > regulator has a vaccum line on it, connected to intake manifold vacuum. > It's built so less intake manifold pressure equals higher fuel > pressure. When the throttle is opened ..intake manfiold pressure drops > .....raising the fuel pressure as controled by the fuel pressure regulator. > if the injectors are held open the same amount of time...more > pressure means more fuel molecules get injected, thus richening the > mixture for acceleration. Pretty clever, and fairly crude, but it works > well. > > Ignitio...base timing is set by the rotational position of the > distributor in the engine block. > on 1.9's advance is control by centrifugal weights in the distributor ( > how many people or engine techs even know anymore that felt pad under > the rotor is for a drop or two of oil to lube the centifugal mechanism > ??? not many I suspect ! ) > Ignition timing is also controlled by the vacuum capsule on the side of > the distributor. > > on 2'1's igntion timing is entirely electronically controlled. I'm > trying to think of how it could be load sensitive ...and can't think of > how it would know that...seems it's only pegged to rpm. I'll have to > think about that more. > > as for fuel pooling in the intake manifold or anything like that .. > I just have never seen any concern about that ..........other than a > sequential system would give more power , possibly better driveability > and better fuel economy. > > I must live in a different world than some people.. > bad 02's don't ruin cats that I've seen ( though to be fair, I am not > dealing with vanagons that get smog checks ) ... > intake valves don't get carboned up .. > etc. > > Oh ..i get it. By 'discharge' you might mean squirting of fuel by the > injectors. > They're all fired like one big one.. > and it's not really timed, even though injection events are triggered by > ignition pulses. > It's kind of imprecise and was 'good enough' for the era. > > Just move up to a distributorless, knock sensor, 4 valves per cylinder, > sequential injection engine ... > the common subaru conversion. They just rip. > What's not to like ? ! > more power, with a fat power band, better throttle repsonse, better > fuel economy , and an extra thousand rpm to play with ... > and ..they use an Air Mass Meter .. ( and some later ones don't even use > one of those ) > > if anyone finds this interesting...here is why an Air Mass Meter is a > huge advance over an Air Flow Meter. > An AFM has mechanical contacts in it ..those wear. AFM's run 'uneven' > after a while. > The flapper door is anther obstruction in the air intake path . A choke > point. > > An Air Mass Meter ....no moving parts. No electrical contacts other than > the plug on the side of it. > The way it works is a small current flows through nearly invisible wires > right in the middle of the air flowing through it. > The ECU sees changes in resistance in those wires by how much air is > flowing over the tiny wires. > > And get this ....both barometric pressure > and humidity affect what the ECU sees for air flow ! It can't make up > for altitude and less air to work with of course... > but air temp, barometric pressure, and humidity all affect what the ECU > sees air-wise. > > About all that ever happens to them is junk or dirt gets on the fine > wires . I have to clean my turbo Volvo air mass meter wires every once > in a great while. You can buy air mass meter spray cleaner at a FLAPS. > I never have to clean Subaru ones. > > and then after that ....this 2002 Forester 2.5 I'm almost finish with, > doesn't even have an air mass meter, just a pressure sensor called a MAP > sensor ..bolted on the intake manifold. Between coolant temp, throttle > position and map sensor inputs, the ecu knows what to do. > And they are really reliable too. > Seriously ... a well set up subaru engine in a vanagon holds that 'tune' > very, very well. > Waterboxers somehow seem to loose it after a while, needing a little > tweaking or adjusting. > Waterboxers by the way .. > in my experience .....the traditional tune up parts ..the ignition stuff > ...in my world that stuff doesn't even wear , or barely barely. Sure > eventually those parts wear and need replacing ...and very often cap, > rotor, plug wires and spark plugs are 'not what's wrong' on a waterboxer > engine. I have boxes of good Bosch distributor caps with tons of life > left in them. Just barely a wear item. Waterboxers don't use up spark > plugs very much in my experience either. > it's the fuel injection that gets off. > I do recommend a good fuel treatment and injector cleaner once in a > while. I really like SeaFoam. I would never run a gas vanagon for > years on end without treating the fuel once in a while. > > I hope people can read fast ! lol. > > what fun aye !? > Scott > > > On 11/16/2013 9:42 PM, JRodgers wrote: >> Ok, sort of a question here. Given how the injectors fire - all four at >> once - it appears that a "vapor cloud" of air/fuel is provided in the >> intakes and by way of the rpm and valve timing that cloud is pushed ( I >> think in terms of atmospheric pressure pushing rather than a vacuum >> sucking - but either way - the cloud goes into the cylinder) into the >> cylinder at just the right time and in just the right amount to be >> ignited at just the right moment. Consequently - individual injection >> discharge is not needed on the WBX? Do I have that right?? Is that >> basically the big picture?? Or is the ECU timing the period of the >> injector pulse to control the amount of fuel for the amount of air >> through the AFM?? Thus varying the density of the air/fuel vapor cloud >> in the intake at the cylinder head?? >> >> >> John >> >> On 11/16/2013 9:00 PM, Scott Daniel wrote: >>> a few more thoughts.. >>> OK...the injectors fire when there is an ignition pulse , all 4 of them. >>> So ....for the one cylinder that happens to be just before TDC with the >>> spark plug firing .. >>> that cylinder's injection pulse is actually late for that cylinder. >>> >>> the other 3 cylinders .....the injector squirt will be at some other >>> phase of the 4 stroke cycle. >>> It works out that things are moving fast enough ..( I read this years >>> ago in some paper discribing the system ) >>> that injecting into the intake manifold happens continously in >>> pulses...and it all works out. >>> and they are not actually timed to intake valve being open say .. >>> or perhaps one cylinder is . . >>> while the other injector pulses happen in the intake runners at various >>> 'not intake valve opening' times. >>> >>> That's a more elaborate way of saying what I meant when I wrote that >>> injection events do not occur in a 'timed to engine position' way. >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> On 11/16/2013 5:28 PM, JRodgers wrote: >>>> Wow! >>>> >>>> Thanks Mark, for even more illumination on how things work in our >>>> mechanical beasts! >>>> >>>> This is all great stuff for those of us that don't know! >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> On 11/16/2013 4:24 PM, mark drillock wrote: >>>>> The injectors do fire in time with the engine position. All 4 >>>>> injectors >>>>> fire once every hall pulse which happens every 180 degrees of >>>>> crankshaft >>>>> rotation, so twice for every engine revolution. The ignition spark >>>>> is by >>>>> definition according to engine position and the fuel injectors fire >>>>> based on the same triggering event that the ignition uses. Of >>>>> course the >>>>> ECU adjusts the ignition point to optimize it. The ECU also cuts >>>>> off the >>>>> injection pulses when conditions dictate, such as going down hill with >>>>> your foot off the gas, assuming your throttle position switch is >>>>> working. >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>>> >>>>> Scott Daniel wrote: >>>>>> minor correction ...waterboxer injectors don't turn on 'every >>>>>> revolution' .. >>>>>> They are triggered continously in pulses...or in 'injector on >>>>>> time, in >>>>>> milliseconds of duration.' >>>>>> >>>>>> - as one big 4 part injector too btw. Called batch fire. >>>>>> Not sequential, not timed to engine or piston position. >>>>>> Somewhat crude. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »