

| Subject: | Re: Gas question, seriously folks |
| From: | Al Knoll |
| Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:43:53 -0800 |
> > Actually David, it is a high performance car. > > It has sleeping, eating, birdwatching, skiing, poppygathering, moseying, > lookylooing, leafpeeping, fishing, in a "kompakt" performance package, > often imitated, rarely duplicated. > Add a modern motor and it quietly becomes a Q-ship. A tardis with chutzpah! Mosey on, enjoy the ride, nothing to prove, a lot to be seen on the High Definition windscreen. I do. Pensionerd. > What is wrong with driving within the capability of the vehicle? I have > never experienced pinging with my '91 Campmobile with 2.1 Waterboxer > engine. But then, I let it slow down on a grade, downshifting the manual > transmission when I feel it start to lug. I drive at 58 mph generally on > the highway, and I let the wind slow me down if necessary. I just don't > see the need to try to drive the thing like it is a "performance" car. For > that matter, I don't see the need for "performance cars." > > David McNeely >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »