

| Subject: | Re: Engine woes - what to do? |
| From: | Larry Alofs |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:37:39 -0500 |
necessity is the mother of... On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Jeff Palmer <jpalmer@mymts.net> wrote: > Or reasons to swap :) > > > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:07:40 -0600 > > From: jim.felder@GMAIL.COM > > Subject: Re: Engine woes - what to do? > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > > Does anyone know of a car that has more engine swap possibilities than a > > Vanagon? > > > > Jim > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Jack R <jack007@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > I know a couple volks who are very pleased with their Bostig > conversion. > > > http://www.bostig.com/ > > > > > > In my case, I came very close to putting in a 2.5l 5 cly TDI (owned the > > > motor, and was ready to proceed), but the cost to beef up the trans > due to > > > the torque of a diesel among many other things, resulted in converting > my > > > 84 > > > Wolfie to a 2.1L out of a 91 in tip top shape. Very pleased in all. > As I > > > use my Westie for a few weekends of Michigan Camping, and put about > 5,000 > > > miles on it a year, the ROI from the costly conversion to get more MPG > or > > > performance is not there for me. > > > > > > Each conversion is a unique decision, and Scott makes some valid > points on > > > your current situation. > > > > > > Good luck with whatever you do... I'll speak for everyone on this > list, we > > > ALL hate to see any Vanagon leave circulation!! > > > > > > Jack R. > > > 84 Westy Wolfie with a 2.1L (owned since 87, and restored to original > > > splendor) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On > Behalf Of > > > Scott Daniel > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:14 AM > > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > > Subject: Re: Engine woes - what to do? > > > > > > I'll have to second this. Inline 4 gasser didn't pop into my mind as a > > > solution out of the poster's current delema .. > > > but yeah .. > > > simple , cheap, durable, easily repalced, all VW , good fuel economy, > > > decent > > > power .. > > > there is a lot to like in a VW-based I4 gasser conversion. > > > > > > ...if I ever find time to my to play with my 3 actually.... ..mutter > > > mutter. > > > > > > > > > On 12/23/2013 4:07 PM, Don Hanson wrote: > > > > I'll chime in for the inline VW swap as probably the simplest and > most > > > > economical way to go. Like Jim, I really like the power, the fuel > > > > economy and the overall simplicity of having a VW motor on VW parts > in > > > > my VW van. I did keep the Digifant 1.8 liter head and all the > wires > > > > do plug right in, pretty much. It bolts right in using VW diesel > > > > parts that are available and proven...the diesel VW engine is the > same > > > > block as the gasser, so all the parts for mounting it are factory > > > > stock. ABA blocks are also identical. My motor cost me about $600 > > > > to build from a $300 Jetta ABA and I sold off the extra parts to > > > > almost make a profit. > > > > You can find almost unlimited inline VW motors for under $500 all > > > > over everywhere. The only downside is there is no one source of > > > > information on this particular swap, not that it needs a lot of > > > > explaining. Inline parts are dirt cheap, they are simple to work on > > > > and quite robust. I was a VW rookie when I got mine already > > > > converted, but the fellow who did the conversion was a carpenter and > > > > not a mechanic. I've since done a lot of swapping around and messing > > > > with it, mainly to learn and because they are so cheap and > > > > simple....They are easy to mess with....I never HAD to work on mine > > > > much, but I chose to go to the ABA 2.0 liter block after reading > about > > > > it and finding one for $300...Took me 2 days, about to swap all the > > > > stuff over and re-install it into my van. I have a spare motor now, > > > > too...should I ever need one. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Todd Last <rubatoguy@comcast.net> > > > wrote: > > > >> After almost 230,00 miles my '88 Vanagon is displaying symptoms of a > > > head > > > leak - I have not yet confirmed this or done a recent compression > test, but > > > plan to do so. I have concluded that one of the worst things you can > do to > > > your van is not use it. Bad things happen when they are left sitting! > > > >> In any case I am looking at my options, and started out thinking > about > > > replacing the heads, then thought if I was going to do that, I might as > > > well > > > put in new piston rings too, and well, once you do that you might as > well > > > go > > > a step farther and do an engine rebuild. Of course, once you get > there, > > > the > > > question becomes, stock, modified (like GoWesty) or engine swap. In > > > looking > > > at these options, it looks like a cost of $5,000 or more. From what I > have > > > seen, Subaru conversions can reach over $10K. Yikes! > > > >> > > > >> I was wondering if I could get opinions on the best course of > action in > > > this situation, not wanting to spend tens of thousands of dollars. > Would > > > list memebers give me their 2 cents worth and if possible, what the > > > aproximate costs for the various solutions range from? I'm not sure > if it > > > makes more sence to just install new heads and hope for the best, or go > > > full > > > bore and swap the engine. > > > >> > > > >> What does the voice of experience say? Anyone out there have > opinions on > > > the GoWesty performance engines vs. a Subaru transplant? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Todd > > > >> '88 Westy > > > >> > > > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »