

| Subject: | Re: 1991 westy - altitude sickness? |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:55:15 -0600 |
High octane fuel is not required at high altitudes. In fact, if a given octane is required for your vehicle at low altitudes, you can use a lower octane at altitude. The regulators and the oil companies know this. Look at the pump next time you are in Colorado, West Texas, Wyoming ....... . The standard for regular grade gasoline at low altitudes is 87 octane. In the places I named, regular is 86 or 85 octane. It burns just as slowly (meaning better) up there as 87 octane does down low. mcneely ---- Steven Johnson <sjohnso2000@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > On those kind of trips (cross-country or long distance) I do use 91 octane > as I understood that it tends keep > the heads slightly cooler. > > Good question, > > Steven > 91 Westy > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Robert Stevens <mtbiker62@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 20, 2014, at 2:07 PM, KevinPGilleran <kevin@GILLERANENERGY.COM> > > wrote: > > > > All, > > > > On my last trip out to the Grand Canyon and then circling clockwise around > > to Zion I found that my 1991 westy had problems with what I can only > > imagine > > is the altitude (4970 ft at Kanab Utah). I could barely get the van up to > > 50 > > miles per hour the entire time we were at elevation. But once we dropped > > back down into California and were back on highway 5 (400 feet or so) we > > were back up 70 mph no problem. > > Any ideas of where I should start on this issue would be much appreciated. > > > > Your '91 says it requires 91 octane on the fuel cover door IIRC? > > Is this a change in altitude performance for your van? > > Do you use 91 octane? > > > > My performance suffers at higher altitude as well, but then I have an > > engine > > conversion (Subie) and always use 91 octane. I guess I wonder if this is > > the > > first time this has happened in your travels at altitude, or if it's just > > been a long > > time since you were driving your van at that altitude? > > > > bob -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »