

| Subject: | Re: cheap '89 Bluestar on CL |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:01:45 -0600 |
I test drove an automatic and a manual when I bought my Carat new in 1990. Hated the automatic, bought the manual. When my daughter got a 1990 automatic a few years ago, I loved it. Vanagons have sure changed a lot in 24 years. Jim On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Aristotle Sagan <killer.jupiter@gmail.com>wrote: > Funny, I don't remember shifting my cars at all. It's automatic. And yes > the car is a manual. > > The daughter, learning to drive in my Ferd 5 speed, has a better > appreciation of my driving skills. > > At least if she wrecks the Ferd, it wasn't a Vanagon. > > tim in san jose > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Don Hanson <dhanson928@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I, too, find that I wouldn't have an automatic transmission, most > > especially in a vehicle that ventures off the Interstates and city > > streets. Just yesterday I self-started my 84 5sp by pushing it by the > door > > post and hopping in to pop the clutch. A minor delay as opposed to a > major > > production getting AAA to come (nearest AAA is over 50 miles away) I also > > like being able to modulate the way it gets going by how I release the > > clutch, and to choose a proper gear, to anticipate a driving situation I > > can see, but some automatic shifter would mess up....like an un-asked for > > shift when cornering on slick roads, or trying to rock out of a > semi-stuck > > situation. > > So far I don't find shifting my own gears is too much work, the better > > functionality certainly is worthwhile, in my world....if I commuted in LA > > daily, then I might consider an automatic... > > > > > > -- > Where ever you are, there you be. Unless you're driving my van, in which > case, you ain't got there yet. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »