

| Subject: | Re: Anyone tried "LubriCheck" yet?? |
| From: | Dick Wong |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:50:26 -0800 |
I'm somewhat of a gadget junkie. I just bought one. Should arrive in a couple weeks. The item number came up as "LUBRICHECK2", so that confirms this is the second generation (Oilyzer). My Scirocco has not had an oil change in more than 5 years. It will be interesting to see how that oil checks out. -Dick- 78 Scirocco 87 Vanagon Syncro 12 Golf TDI On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@gmail.com>wrote: > I checked the "Bob the Oil Guy" forum for "Oilyzer" and found a thread from > 2010. Apparently they had problems getting it to market back then. One > caveat is if there is fuel dilution it reads bad oil as good. Here is a > comment from "Oilyzerman" himself: > > "The Oilyzer product uses the same physics for sensing the TBN of oil as > many of the oil sensors used by automotive manufacturers. Although GM uses > predictive statistics to assess the next oil change (often surpassing 15K > mile oil replacements for newer vehicles), other manufacturers use > capacitive sensing for detecting the oil acidity level, typically based on > the TBN (Total Base Number)of the oil under test. As oil becomes more > acidic > due to friction, temperature, pressure, suspended contaminants etc, the TBN > value changes, and is a very reliable indicator of oil quality. Optical or > Photoelectric sensing has been used in the past to gauge the viscosity and > opacity of oil, but has been proven to be unreliable and is not a > technology > used in the "Oilyzer" product. The combined capacitive and resistive > aspects > of measuring oil health or quality determines acidity, viscosity and > contaminants (metal particulates, soot, dirt, coolant, water) with the > exception of gasoline. > > The Oilyzer is able to capture most of the information regarding the "TBN" > of oil when compared to a high end spectroscopy, flash and chemical based > tests. It is a scientific and technologically reliable indicator when > measured against subjective human based test methods (based on the color of > oil or driving mileages. > > There is a plethora of scientific information on the web and in scientific > journals or on SAE.org supporting the premise for reducing the number of > unnecessary oil changes (replacements) and to extend driving distances > based > on TBN and other factors related to scientific measurement rather than by > subjective means. > > http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/UsedOil/OilChange/ > http://www.nordicgroup.us/oil.htm > http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/09/08/the-3000-mile-oil-change-myth/ > www.sae.org keywords engine "oil dielectric longevity" > > The Oilyzer tests oil the same way a person is able to determine their > health by a blood test. It targets the four main variables for general oil > testing; > > 1. Total mileage of the engine. > 2. User driving habits (stop start versus long haul driving). > 3. Environment the vehicle is typically driven (ambient temps, humidity, > etc). > 4. Engine condition (poor, fair, good). > > Auto manufacturers already have many vehicles on US roads today, with oil > sensors on board, surpassing 15K miles between oil changes without any oil > or engine modifications warranting such mileage extensions (see GM > technical > forum). The 3000 mile myth stems from the post WWII era, and it is easy to > understand that oil and engine science and technology has advanced to > accommodate superior performance and longevity of oil and an owner's > vehicle > since that era." > > I wouldn't need this for my Vanagon since I go by time, not miles, but it > could be useful on my other cars. > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Paul Rogers > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 9:02 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Anyone tried "LubriCheck" yet?? > > Is it legit or is it fool of it? Pun is intended I have spell check enabled > > Sent from my Pad where I keep my iPad > > > On Jan 23, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Jeff Schwaia <vw.doka@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > > > It's not new, just a name change, update, and re-release of an older > > product: Oilyzer > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jeff >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »