

| Subject: | Re: Talking about Vanagon prices |
| From: | Abel Longoria |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:20:47 -0500 |
I agree. Totally.. Just funny to think the price of my 1987 Westy compared to a brand new 1 mile only car... I'm new to the Vanagon game so as a newbie coming in its definitely something that I noticed.. What's funny is to see the reactions of my friends when they ask what I paid for it and I explain it was more than my Mazda. I proceed to tell them they just wouldn't understand until they own one. Lol On Mar 20, 2014 12:04 AM, "Daniel O Stevens" <dosteven@syr.edu> wrote: > See which one you'll still own and enjoy in 4-5 yrs > which one is worth more in 4-5 yrs > which one is already a classic and which one is just a commuter/grocery > getter. > which one will give the next owners a smile and dreams of future travel > possibilities in 4-5yrs. > in 1987 $$ your Mazda3 is an economy car. when comparing inflation tit for > tat. > > > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:10:39 -0500 > From: Abel Longoria <houstonphotog@GMAIL.COM> > Subject: Re: Talking about Vanagon prices > > I'm new to the Vanagon scene.. I bought my 87 Westy last July and paid > 18k... A comparable Syncro was about 10k more. Ouch. Stuck with the > 2wd...fortunately mine had a ton invested in it so even at 18k I think I > got a steal. What's funny is I paid more for my 27 year old Westy than I > did for my 2012 Mazda 3 brand new off the lot... Lol. It kills me when I > think about it in those terms... Lol > > Abel. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »