

| Subject: | Re: Throttle body question |
| From: | Alistair Bell |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:53:35 -0700 |
I don't think its a biggie either. If it is I can adjust with set screw. Thanks again Stuart, Alistair > On Jun 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Stuart MacMillan <stuartmacm@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > I guess I'm just blind. Being uncovered on the AFM side would mean very little vacuum at idle either way. I doubt you'll have any problems. > > Stuart > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of Angus Gordon > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:50 AM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Throttle body question > > Here's a poor shot of my spare TB (2.1) which has about 90K miles and is relatively tight. The orifice is uncovered by the plate on this one (bottom). > > > https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/SOZBHVEbVaS8cDgzVzC8JNMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink > > I can check some more if you'd like. > > > Angus > > >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: >> >> The little vacuum port on the throttle body - I believe the orifice is >> covered by the throttle plate when throttle closed - am I right? >> >> I can't recall for sure. I'm picking up on a project where I rebushed >> (delrin), turned the throat out a few thous, and made a new plate. >> >> The TB currently on my van has become so worn that it is practically >> impossible to set the TB switch and have it work consistently. >> >> Thanks >> >> Alistair >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »