

| Subject: | Re: I rather drive the Vanagon |
| From: | Gnarlodious |
| Date: | Sat, 7 Jun 2014 22:03:48 -0600 |
Probly should qualify that by explaining that the 5-speed shifts the engine to the back by some inches and alters the weight over the rear wheels. So better traction than the typical 4-speed diesel, plus the advantage of the granny gear. OTOH, I don't do a lot of acrobatics in the snow/mud/sand so getting stuck is not something I strive for like you adrenaline guys. -- Gnarlie On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > You haven't tried enough. > > I had a diesel, I got stuck. Weigh distribution pretty well the same as in > the wbx, centre of gravity, well give me the dat showing diesel has lower > one. > > Alistair > > > > > > On Jun 7, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Gnarlodious <gnarlodious@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > > > I think you'll find the diesel has a much better torque/weight ratio, as > > well as a lower center of gravity. I have never gotten stuck. > > > > -- Gnarlie > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Zeitgeist <gruengeist@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I totally concede the poor traction with the 50/50 weight distribution > of a > >> tintop T3. It's been a constant source of frustration for me. I'm > >> presently readying to pull the trans in preps for a TDI install, and > it's > >> definitely getting a TBD, along with the new highway gears. Should > make it > >> a much more pleasant driving experience all around. > >> > >> > >>> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Loren Busch <starwagen@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> RE: Vanagon Stuck On the Grass > >>> BTDT, stuck twice in 50 feet , on the flat, on wet grass. Changed > tires > >>> from Michelin Agilis to Nokian Hakas, problem went away. And now have > >>> Peloquin differential, even better. Light sand and loose dirt not even > >>> noticeable. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Casey > >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »