

| Subject: | Re: I rather drive the Vanagon |
| From: | SDF ( aka ;jim lahey' - Scott ) |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:05:12 -1000 |
if fuel tank loacation was much of a factor, since it's slightly forward, there would be slightly more rear traction with low fuel, Not much of a factor there IMO. it's those cast lower front control arms that add so much weight. lol. On 6/9/2014 12:22 AM, Jarrett Kupcinski wrote: > Gas tank location probably has a lot to do with that. > > I'd agree with Don that the 2wd doesn't have great traction. While I've never gotten myself outright stuck, I have had some "Boy this is going to be embarrassing" moments with significant slippage while driving across a wet, grassy field. > > -J > > On Jun 9, 2014, at 1:34 AM, SDF ( aka ;jim lahey' - Scott ) <scottdaniel@TURBOVANS.COM> wrote: > >> oddly, amazingly ..their is more weight on the front axle than on the >> rear ( drive ) axle !!
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »