

| Subject: | Re: Rear axle nut |
| From: | Jeff Lincoln |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:20:21 -0400 |
My Bentley is the 360/369 version - that's what I used. Thanks, Jeff '85 GL (Gertie) '78 Bus (Melissa) On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > 500 Nm, or 368.78 ft. lbs > > Torque spec was increased over the years to 500 Nm. Procedure is to > tighten to 500 Nm then turn to next slot to install cotter pin. That > additional turn really makes the 360 conversion error rather moot. > > Alistair > > > > > On Jun 16, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Frank Condelli <RAlanen@AOL.COM> wrote: > > > > Question about the torque of the rear axle nut. I have always > been torquing this nut to 360 ft. lbs. Saturday, my neighbour comes by and > tells me in his Bentley Manual the torque is 253 lbs. Yesterday he brings > his book over here for a look see and yes indeed the torque listed in his > book is 253 lbs. We then did some investigating in both books and have > found the following: > > > > My Bentley Manual VV91 - MAN 101 251 F - 94 - 93 - 92 - 91 - > has the following values for the torque of the rear axle nut. > > Page 42.4 - 360 ft. lbs. > > Page 46.6 - 369 ft. lbs > > > > My neighbours Bentley Manual - VV89 - MAN 101 251 E - 92 - 91 - > 90 - has the following values for the torque of the rear axle nut > > Page 42.4 - 360 ft. lbs. > > Page 46.6 - 253 ft. lbs. > > > > So…. better check your Bentley boys & girls because there seems to be > some errors. I still believe the correct torque is 360 ft. lbs. until I am > proven wrong. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Frank Condelli > > Almonte, Ontario, Canada > > '87 VW Westy, '00 Kawasaki 250 Sherpa, "98 Ducati 750 Monster & Lionel > Trains (Collection for sale) > > Frank Condelli & Associates - Vanagon/Vanagon Westfalia Service in the > Ottawa Valley > > BusFusion a VW Camper camping event, Almonte, ON, June 05 ~ 08, 2014 >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »