

| Subject: | Re: AFM test readings |
| From: | Rocket J Squirrel |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Jul 2014 16:56:15 -0700 |
David's suggestion to use an analog voltmeter is a good one. Analog meters catch glitches and dropouts that digital meters don't. The question is -- who has a good value in an analog multimeter these days? Simpsons were my go-tos in Ye Days of Olde when Knights Were Bold and I had a budget. -- Jack "Rocket j Squirrel" Elliott 1984 Westfalia, auto trans, Bend, Ore. On 07/03/2014 04:12 PM, Harold Teer wrote: > David, > > Thanks for a great and detailed explanation on the AFM that even I > understand. Between the information from you, Karl, and Neil, this thread > will be a wonderful resource in the archives for understanding the AFM > better. > > Have a great weekend and 4th of July, > > Harold > > Harold Teer > 1991 Westy -- VANGAUX > Harrisonburg, VA > > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote: > >> At 09:10 AM 7/3/2014, Harold Teer wrote: >> >>> Thanks, this makes sense in theory. Â Can you walk me through how to do >>> this without the AFM connected if I don't have any fancy equipment. Â Do >>> have analog and digital meters so have that part covered. >>> >> >> To do it with the AFM in the van, follow the procedure in tencentlife's >> video. Pull the boot off the connector, stick your meter probes in as he >> shows, turn on the ignition and follow his procedure of very slowly pushing >> the AFM vane open with a stick of some sort. You have to be slow enough >> that the meter has time to respond to any dropouts. Notice he's using a >> fairly small meter with a fairly quick-responding needle. If you have a >> larger one that responds very slowly (like a couple of Radio Shack meters I >> have) you have to move the vane slow enough that you can see the needle >> dip. Any dip at all means a problem at that point on the track, you don't >> have to wait for it to fall to zero; you should see the voltage only rising >> as you push the vane open. >> >> To do it using dry cells or a power supply (and having been reminded by >> Neil's photo of the resistor plate itself, I expect a nine-volt square >> battery would be fine and maybe easier to hook up to), hook up the battery >> to the same pins the ECU would use. I don't have access to a Bentley right >> now but according to the video the AFM pins for the waterboxers are: >> >> 1 - Temp I hot >> 2 - AFM wiper >> 3 - AFM + supply >> 4 - System ground for both AFM and Temp I >> >> So you'd hook B+ to pin 3 and B- to pin 4. You'd hook meter + to pin 2 >> and meter - to pin 4. >> >> Don't use your digital meter, it will only cause you grief. It probably >> only takes 2-3 readings per second, and the reading is averaged over the >> sampling time which is less than half of the half- or third-second cycle >> time. If your meter has a quick-responding bar graph display you might >> manage; but the analog meter responds in real time and is always reading >> the line. Even if the needle response is slow it will be easier to deal >> with than the digital (may or may not be easier than the bar graph display. >> >> If for some reason you do use the digital, set it on a fixed range, as you >> don't want it switching ranges while you're testing. >> >> Set your meter range as low as practical that's at least half the input >> voltage. As tcl says that will cover the part of the AFM track that gets >> the wear. >> >> FYI, if you look at Neil's photo of an uninistalled resistor plate: >> https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-c5axVMck2Ks/T-tDy8qL_MI/ >> AAAAAAAAF2o/Cly2OSeHmUk/s912/AFM%2520Board%2520Wear.jpg >> >> At the bottom there's the Bourns name and Bosch symbol, indicating a >> proprietary part made for Bosch. 8712 means it was made in week 12 of >> 1987. The two crosses and two triangles I imagine are registration test >> marks for the several layers of stuff that get printed onto the ceramic >> substrate. The spot on the left-hand triangle may be an inspector's mark. >> The long number is Bourns' part number for the plate, the 1 probably means >> revision 1 of the device, and the reversed C looks like a test resistor to >> validate the resistor printing process for quality control >> >> Above that is the wiper track. The right side is the ground side and the >> left side is hot, corresponding to the rotation of the vane in the AFM. >> >> Now look at the very top. The two bright dots are where the spring >> contacts have burnished the silver paint that forms the conductors. >> Theleft one is + and the right one -. Following them, you'll see that >> each connects to a green patch with lines on it. Those are resistors, and >> the lines are where the trimming laser burned away parts of the resistor to >> increase its resistance to the correct value. >> >> From the other end of the resistor conductors go to the two ends of the >> wiper track. If they were the only connections you'd be able to do this >> test with an analog ohmmeter instead of a voltmeter. But as you can see >> there is also a resistor that stretches the entire length of the track, >> with nine connections into the track and laser trims between each pair of >> connections. That's what's driving your ohmmeter nuts. It's a voltage >> divider that's feeding an offset voltage into the track at those nine >> points to adjust the wiper response. When Bourns builds the plate the >> laser trimmer has point contacts that leave the tiny bright mark on the >> little side tabs coming away from the various resistors, and it trims the >> resistors in a particular sequence until all the values are correct. It >> looks as though it does a roughing pass and then a finishing pass to take >> care of interaction between the voltage divider and the two main input >> resistors. Then they ship it to Bosch who glue it onto the metal mounting >> plate. >> >> While I'm on the subject, in tcl's video the long copper arm is carries >> the contact from the AFM connector to the wiper. It has a carbon button in >> the round end ant there's a flat spring with a bump on it that comes up >> from the vane/wiper assembly and presses on it. However apparently there >> were difficulties with this, because by at least late '83 Bosch had added a >> braided copper flex cable to bypass this button and make a solid connection. >> >> Yours, >> David >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »