

| Subject: | Re: AFM test readings |
| From: | Larry Alofs |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Jul 2014 08:06:36 -0400 |
Looks like Radio Shack still two analog models, One for $25 and one fro $30. Larry A. On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Larry Alofs <lalofs@gmail.com> wrote: > Scott, > Do you have a link? When I search at the HF site, all the meters are > digital except one that mounts in the dash. > > Larry A. > > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:50 AM, SDF ( aka ;jim lahey' - Scott ) < > scottdaniel@turbovans.com> wrote: > >> if your goal is an inexpensive basic analogue volt meter.. >> they can be as low at $ 4.95 or even $ 3.95 at Harbor Freight ..and in >> Oregon ..no sales tax either. >> or... >> like 15 bucks will go a long way toward getting one that's decent enough. >> >> >> On 7/3/2014 1:56 PM, Rocket J Squirrel wrote: >> >>> David's suggestion to use an analog voltmeter is a good one. Analog >>> meters catch glitches and dropouts that digital meters don't. >>> >>> The question is -- who has a good value in an analog multimeter these >>> days? Simpsons were my go-tos in Ye Days of Olde when Knights Were Bold >>> and I had a budget. >>> >>> -- >>> Jack "Rocket j Squirrel" Elliott >>> 1984 Westfalia, auto trans, >>> Bend, Ore. >>> >>> On 07/03/2014 04:12 PM, Harold Teer wrote: >>> >>>> David, >>>> >>>> Thanks for a great and detailed explanation on the AFM that even I >>>> understand. Between the information from you, Karl, and Neil, this >>>> thread >>>> will be a wonderful resource in the archives for understanding the AFM >>>> better. >>>> >>>> Have a great weekend and 4th of July, >>>> >>>> Harold >>>> >>>> Harold Teer >>>> 1991 Westy -- VANGAUX >>>> Harrisonburg, VA >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, David Beierl <dbeierl@attglobal.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> At 09:10 AM 7/3/2014, Harold Teer wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, this makes sense in theory. Â Can you walk me through how >>>>>> to do >>>>>> this without the AFM connected if I don't have any fancy equipment. >>>>>> Â Do >>>>>> have analog and digital meters so have that part covered. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> To do it with the AFM in the van, follow the procedure in tencentlife's >>>>> video. Pull the boot off the connector, stick your meter probes in >>>>> as he >>>>> shows, turn on the ignition and follow his procedure of very slowly >>>>> pushing >>>>> the AFM vane open with a stick of some sort. You have to be slow >>>>> enough >>>>> that the meter has time to respond to any dropouts. Notice he's >>>>> using a >>>>> fairly small meter with a fairly quick-responding needle. If you >>>>> have a >>>>> larger one that responds very slowly (like a couple of Radio Shack >>>>> meters I >>>>> have) you have to move the vane slow enough that you can see the needle >>>>> dip. Any dip at all means a problem at that point on the track, you >>>>> don't >>>>> have to wait for it to fall to zero; you should see the voltage only >>>>> rising >>>>> as you push the vane open. >>>>> >>>>> To do it using dry cells or a power supply (and having been reminded by >>>>> Neil's photo of the resistor plate itself, I expect a nine-volt square >>>>> battery would be fine and maybe easier to hook up to), hook up the >>>>> battery >>>>> to the same pins the ECU would use. I don't have access to a >>>>> Bentley right >>>>> now but according to the video the AFM pins for the waterboxers are: >>>>> >>>>> 1 - Temp I hot >>>>> 2 - AFM wiper >>>>> 3 - AFM + supply >>>>> 4 - System ground for both AFM and Temp I >>>>> >>>>> So you'd hook B+ to pin 3 and B- to pin 4. You'd hook meter + to pin 2 >>>>> and meter - to pin 4. >>>>> >>>>> Don't use your digital meter, it will only cause you grief. It probably >>>>> only takes 2-3 readings per second, and the reading is averaged over >>>>> the >>>>> sampling time which is less than half of the half- or third-second >>>>> cycle >>>>> time. If your meter has a quick-responding bar graph display you might >>>>> manage; but the analog meter responds in real time and is always >>>>> reading >>>>> the line. Even if the needle response is slow it will be easier to >>>>> deal >>>>> with than the digital (may or may not be easier than the bar graph >>>>> display. >>>>> >>>>> If for some reason you do use the digital, set it on a fixed range, >>>>> as you >>>>> don't want it switching ranges while you're testing. >>>>> >>>>> Set your meter range as low as practical that's at least half the input >>>>> voltage. As tcl says that will cover the part of the AFM track that >>>>> gets >>>>> the wear. >>>>> >>>>> FYI, if you look at Neil's photo of an uninistalled resistor plate: >>>>> https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-c5axVMck2Ks/T-tDy8qL_MI/ >>>>> AAAAAAAAF2o/Cly2OSeHmUk/s912/AFM%2520Board%2520Wear.jpg >>>>> >>>>> At the bottom there's the Bourns name and Bosch symbol, indicating a >>>>> proprietary part made for Bosch. 8712 means it was made in week 12 of >>>>> 1987. The two crosses and two triangles I imagine are registration >>>>> test >>>>> marks for the several layers of stuff that get printed onto the ceramic >>>>> substrate. The spot on the left-hand triangle may be an inspector's >>>>> mark. >>>>> The long number is Bourns' part number for the plate, the 1 >>>>> probably means >>>>> revision 1 of the device, and the reversed C looks like a test >>>>> resistor to >>>>> validate the resistor printing process for quality control >>>>> >>>>> Above that is the wiper track. The right side is the ground side and >>>>> the >>>>> left side is hot, corresponding to the rotation of the vane in the AFM. >>>>> >>>>> Now look at the very top. The two bright dots are where the spring >>>>> contacts have burnished the silver paint that forms the conductors. >>>>> Theleft one is + and the right one -. Following them, you'll see >>>>> that >>>>> each connects to a green patch with lines on it. Those are >>>>> resistors, and >>>>> the lines are where the trimming laser burned away parts of the >>>>> resistor to >>>>> increase its resistance to the correct value. >>>>> >>>>> From the other end of the resistor conductors go to the two ends of >>>>> the >>>>> wiper track. If they were the only connections you'd be able to do >>>>> this >>>>> test with an analog ohmmeter instead of a voltmeter. But as you can >>>>> see >>>>> there is also a resistor that stretches the entire length of the track, >>>>> with nine connections into the track and laser trims between each >>>>> pair of >>>>> connections. That's what's driving your ohmmeter nuts. It's a voltage >>>>> divider that's feeding an offset voltage into the track at those nine >>>>> points to adjust the wiper response. When Bourns builds the plate the >>>>> laser trimmer has point contacts that leave the tiny bright mark on the >>>>> little side tabs coming away from the various resistors, and it >>>>> trims the >>>>> resistors in a particular sequence until all the values are >>>>> correct. It >>>>> looks as though it does a roughing pass and then a finishing pass to >>>>> take >>>>> care of interaction between the voltage divider and the two main input >>>>> resistors. Then they ship it to Bosch who glue it onto the metal >>>>> mounting >>>>> plate. >>>>> >>>>> While I'm on the subject, in tcl's video the long copper arm is carries >>>>> the contact from the AFM connector to the wiper. It has a carbon >>>>> button in >>>>> the round end ant there's a flat spring with a bump on it that comes up >>>>> from the vane/wiper assembly and presses on it. However apparently >>>>> there >>>>> were difficulties with this, because by at least late '83 Bosch had >>>>> added a >>>>> braided copper flex cable to bypass this button and make a solid >>>>> connection. >>>>> >>>>> Yours, >>>>> David >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »