

| Subject: | Re: End of Draft: Analog VOMs for vans, was Re: AFM test readings |
| From: | David Beierl |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Jul 2014 12:26:23 -0400 |
Hi Harold, At 09:04 AM 7/5/2014, Harold Teer wrote: >Thanks so much for taking the time to put this >double posting together. � I feel bad that my >question regarding AFM testing caused you to >spend so much time working on this but this ended up being a great resource. Harold, I'm grateful to you and Mr. Squirrel both. That was not how I planned to spend my night, but I think it was a good deal more productive than anything else I would have done. Regardless, I wouldn't have done some things I *should* have been doing, but I think this was a more than worthwhile substitute. And I'm tickled pink that my jaded belief that it was coherent isn't turning out wrong. And I must have thought of a hundred things I left out, along with shoving it into a slightly fancier editor than Eudora and actually formatting it a little bit. With a bit of effort I think it could be ready to put in the wiki and be a solid resource for some time to come. I've been well paid for my night's work. Best, David
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »