

| Subject: | Re: Replacement fuel tank question |
| From: | Roy Nicholl |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2014 21:19:33 -0300 |
I find it strange that the aftermarket providers who continue to manufacture fuel tanks for these vehicles continued to keep the "saddle" in their construction. A few quick measurements of the tank dropped from the '88 indicates one could expect 14-18 additional litres of fuel if they were not there and the tank would be simpler to manufacture. On 20-Jul-2014, at 20:50, Stuart MacMillan wrote: > No, and blame Volkswagen for introducing the vanagon with the obsolete air > cooled engine. Was not worth it for them to re-tool for a couple more > gallons of gas. > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Roy Nicholl > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 12:28 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Replacement fuel tank question > > All, > > Does anyone make a replacement fuel tank for the water-cooled Vanagon w/o > the cavities/moulded passages for the air-cooled heater pipes. While I > appreciate the needs of the air-heads, I would prefer the extra range this > capacity could provide if that volume was on the inside of the tank. >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »