

| Subject: | Re: Porterfield R4-S Rear Brake Shoes |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:46:12 -0500 |
If they are better I would like to know about it. I am always happy when vendors step out and make improvements for old cars, I applaud them for that. But in this case, only 30% (or less, in most cases) of the stopping power comes from the rear shoes. They last so long that they are usually ruined by leaking cylinders more often than wear. But it these are actually better, then good. Jim On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > > Fair point. I Should have Clarified. > > Have people found that changing to these shoes has helped reduce brake > fade? > But then I understand that the front brakes are responsible for ~ 70% of > the braking. > > On Monday, October 6, 2014, Jim Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com> wrote: > >> They would have to be some mighty good shoes to show a noticeable >> improvement on the rear brakes. >> >> Jim >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> If anyone is running these, did you find a marked increase in braking >>> performance? >>> >> >> > > > -- > Neil n > > Blog: tubaneil.blogspot.ca > > '88 Westy http://tinyurl.com/c8rlw6p > > '81 VanaJetta 2.0 "Jaco" http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/ > > Vanagon VAG *Gas* inline-VR Engine Swap Group: > > http://tinyurl.com/d7gd5ej > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »