

| Subject: | Re: Radius Rod Landing on Frame |
| From: | Miguel Pacheco |
| Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:32:47 -0700 |
So there are two offerings from T3. A purple and a yellow radius rod bushing kit. I'm not looking to color coordinate or any cool factor. I'm interested to know which works best with the washer repair. Gracias *Miguel* *The free soul is rare, but you know it when you see it- basically because you feel good, very good, when you are near or with them. * *- Charles Bukowski, Tales of Ordinary* On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/20/15, Jim Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Neil, it looks like you .... welded it in on top of the old part. > > Hi Jim. Yes. This is what I did. I welded a new piece of plate to face of > frame. > > > The washer technique would yield the same result--new metal for the > > hole. The fact that the new part if thicker than or offset to the > original > > body metal can easily be compensated for by repositioning the washers and > > nuts on the threaded end of the rod. > > For sure. Yes. Thanks. If we're talking about the castor setting, I > understood that adding new metal plate to frame face wouldn't cause an > issue in that regard. > > This is not a great image: > > https://sites.google.com/site/tubaneil2/RadiusArmHoleBack.jpg > > but it shows a new bushing installed to the frame I repaired. The > black arrow points to lip of the bushing which is not sitting flush to > frame face. > > Granted this was my first time doing a radius rod bushing job but I > assumed that in the case of an un-repaired OEM thickness frame, the > bushing lip in frame hole ID should sit flush to face at other side of > frame. It appeared to me that adding new metal plate to frame face > would position the bushing so that the bushing lip in hole ID wasn't > flush to frame face. > > Sorry for all the writing I'm doing but it is well intended. :) > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Neil N <musomuso@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 1/20/15, OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > >> > The WasherThickness Won't Cause a Prob' ~ Just need to be sure > >> that Washer > >> > ID Matches the OD > >> > > >> > of the Step on the RubberBush' or the Alum'Bush if you use T3 ~ > >> > >> Maybe I missed a detail in a post here or it wasn't made, or I'm just > >> thick in the head, (LOL) but I'm assuming the washer in question would > >> be welded to face of subframe as per repair I did. Image: > >> > >> https://sites.google.com/site/tubaneil2/RadiusArmHoleFront.jpg > >> > >> (my welding has improved some since then. ha ha.) > >> > >> Are Miguel et al talking about welding a washer, or part of a washer, > >> to ID of hole at frame? > >> > > > > > -- > Neil n > > Blog: Vanagons, Westfalia, general <http://tubaneil.blogspot.ca> > > 1988 Westy Images <https://picasaweb.google.com/musomuso/New1988Westy> > > 1981 Westfalia "Jaco" Images, technical <http://tubaneil.googlepages.com/> > > Vanagon-Bus VAG Gas Engine Swap Group <http://tinyurl.com/khalbay> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »