

| Subject: | Re: Is anybody still on this list? |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:33:06 -0500 |
My '91, like many (most?) earlier models, dripped from the head gaskets when the ambient temperature was really cold. Taken care of, no leaks now. mcneely ---- "Mudd \"Not Jack\" Sparrow" <rummaging@YAHOO.COM> wrote: > My stock 91 had drooling headgaskets. > > I used the Red Moroso Ceramic Engine Sealer with pure water. > > Then with coolant kept adding capfuls of the blue version; the All Weather Seal. > > IronTite is probably the same thing. > > Drove from CA to FL to NY to Ohio to CA and for many years drove like that in CA. > > The greenish drool of the gaskets became a clay color. > > The metal of the radiator self sealed cracks. > > My radiator bleeder sealed itself I ended up stripping it, so I covered the whole thing with epoxy from a truck stop and just bleed it by burping the rear when elevated. > > The weep hole of the water pump sealed itself and the water pump kept working fine. > > It was nerve wracking, but it seemed to work. > > I wouldn't wish that on anyone though. Better to spend the money on a fresh conversion than to suffer the fear of thrown rods. > > Biggest problem I've had with the conversion has been excessive burning of oil. > > Hope to get another engine and avoid the consumption of oil. Lots of oil leaks have been repaired. More than the stock engine. Maybe I really need an oil pressure gauge. > > And currently I'm constantly losing coolant. I have to wonder if it's the water pump. Someone changed my timing belt without changing the water pump. Bad choice since it's a Subaru 2.2 > > They should have asked me. It should have been obvious I was well overdue for the timing belt, so the the water pump should have been at least questioned. > > The overflow tank has a steam release at the top, and it keeps getting hot enough to steam right out. > > It never ever use to do that. > > > > On Mar 18, 2015, at 7:05 PM, Jon VO <jondvo@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > > > A friend had about 190K on his '86 Syncro engine, but the heads needed > > reseal & valve guides. I was told the later models '89-'91 did not have > > the same head seal issue, and may be candidates for high miles. As I > > recall, there was no '88 US model due to poor sales? > > Jon > > > > > >> On 3/18/2015 8:02 PM, Ben wrote: > >> I had 386K miles on my '87 before the heads sprung an external leak. I decided not to reseal only because a very low mileage inline-4 was made available to me for a conversion. The shop who took the engine in as a core decided it was better to rebuild the bottom end, just to be safe. > >> > >> > >> BenT > >> sent from my electronic leash > >> > >>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Jon VO <jondvo@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > >>> > >>> OK, whom has the most miles on an original WBX? 240K seems like a winner > >>> here.... -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »