

| Subject: | Re: van comparisons {was (Friday NVC) When Euro hits parity} |
| From: | Dave Mcneely |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:43:58 -0500 |
---- Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote: > > I think VW knows that until they have products that truly compete with the > Ford or Mercedes van or trucks there is little sense going for the American > market. As for campers most folks want fully featured units including > toilets and showers and enough room to be comfortable. As you start heading > North of $40K there are a lot of choices beyond a van with a pop up tent. But what some of us want is a van with a pop up tent, maybe just a scooch more room, but that's not essential. Showers and toilets? Nope, not me, not needed. But I would like modern reliability. mcneely > > Dennis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Stuart MacMillan > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 12:38 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: (Friday NVC) When Euro hits parity > > VW has a limited product line in the US, and their biggest problem here will > be meeting the ever increasing CAFE fuel economy standards, hence the > introduction of the very expensive e-Golf Who's going to buy this for > $34,000? And, the subsidized $299/mo lease is only available in 10 states > and DE. > > CAFE means selling more fuel efficient cars to bring up the fleet average, > and bringing in vans without a subsidized electric or hybrid high mileage > car to offset them won't help. I think that's the main reason we won't see > a van any time soon. Or maybe we'll see only TDI vans! > > Compared to #1 Toyota with the Prius, a bunch of gas sippers (including the > tiny 37 mpg Scion iQ), two pickup trucks (at least one is essential in the > US), their bread and butter Camry, and a Van, distant #2 VW has a long way > to go. But I would like to see them try harder. > > Stuart > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf Of > Jon VO > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:38 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: (Friday NVC) When Euro hits parity > > Except the Eos, the Golf R, and the CC are mainly optioned versions of > existing NA models, the California is not imported in any form. > > > On 3/18/2015 8:39 PM, James wrote: > > Volvo has been way behind Toyota in reliability for the last five > > years or > so. > > > > Thing is, reliability or the lack thereof isn't the buying factor it > > used > to be, as overall automotive reliability is now so high - the 'average' in > Consumer Reports now was the five star reliability rating of 15 years ago. > > > > And as to the idea that 'special low volume models aren't part of that > business model" - VW sells the EOS, the CC, the Golf R - all low volume, all > to showcase the brand. Yet most of the public could hardly place a CC or an > EOS if they were challenged, when everybody knows the VW bus. Importing the > California camper, with special trim lines to celebrate the camper, seems a > natural. > > > > As the EOS and R have shown, a 'US federalised' model need not be a > stopper. The handful of years they've sold the R on this side of the > Atlantic, they've brought in as few as 400 per year, IIRC. > > > > James > > Ottawa, ON > > -- David McNeely
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »