

| Subject: | Re: Outside magazine article Vanagon/Sprinter content |
| From: | Jim Felder |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Apr 2015 11:09:08 -0500 |
It reminds me of an old Car and Driver parody of a Consumer Reports article: "Both the Porsche 911 and the Dodge Dart have six cylinder engines. But since the Dodge has a usable back seat, we think it is the better buy." Jim On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:40 AM, vw_van_fan_Mark <madvws@cox.net> wrote: > Might as well say this is a better choice: > > http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/cto/4959450186.html > > than this: > > http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/cto/4985218983.html > > Vanagons offer somethings that nothing else does. If you don't know what > they are and can't tell the difference then I pity you. > > Mark > > > Don Hanson wrote: > >> ...Even more impressive than either, are the older mid-size GM vans >> like Safari and Astro, which match performance with the Collector Syncro >> and the Gucci Sprinter, but do it at 1/100th of the cost and are a dime a >> dozen for parts and availability. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Dean S <predsmaniac@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> http://www.outsideonline.com/1965851/2015-sprinter-4x4-cheaper-safer-and-smarter-your-ancient-vanagon#slide-1 >>> >>> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »