

| Subject: | Re: Cat Bypass Pipe "pros & cons" |
| From: | Chris Szpejankowski |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:19:10 -0400 |
I tested an empty cat on my '84 Westy. The DJ code engine liked it. No O2 sensor use by ECU in that one and I only used it monitor fuel mixture. I noted a slight change in sound. I could not tell or smell the difference otherwise. Wysłane z iPhone'a Dnia 16 kwi 2015 o godz. 18:58 Jack Reynaert <jack007@COMCAST.NET> napisał(a): > Has anyone ran a 2.1L WBX with the CAT Bypass Pipe? > http://www.busdepot.com/039251058 > > > > I've referenced this blog on Samba. > http://www.thesamba.com/vw/forum/viewtopic.php?t=389018 > > Can't draw a clear conclusion, looking for input from direct experience. > > > > Are there any issues which should be considered "pros vs. cons" to running a > 2.1l with a CAT By-pass pipe? > > > > I know that a Bung will need to be installed in the pipe to accommodate the > O2 sensor, but will the O2 still send the correct signal to the ECU? > > > > What has been the experience of the elimination of back-pressure by running > without a CAT help the HP and MPG? > > > > Note: the vehicle is not tested for emissions, so this is not an issue in > our state. realize resale could be impacted (but will keep CAT on hand for > that) > > > > Thanks! > > > > Jack
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »