

| Subject: | Re: [WetWesties] Crazy Idea On Mismatched Tires |
| From: | Roy Nicholl |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:34:56 -0300 |
Jon: I found the Hakka C' to be a little stiff as well. Last summer we were unable to get our hands on a set of Hakka C's before we left Calgary to head east in the Hyena, so we went with XL rates Nokian eNTYREs (which are rated at 99 or 100) ... I had to work through the math a couple of times to prove to myself they would be safe and adequate. I checked them every morning and evening over our 5500km trip home. I've since rotated them and put on another 4000km and all is well. On 16-Jul-2015, at 11:12, Jon VO wrote: > I am running 215/65/r16's as well, Nokian WRC, LI 107. The ride is great > on smooth roads, but a bit hard on rough roads. These would be best on a > 16 x 6 or 6.5" rim instead of the Gowesty alloys as a bit more sidewall > flex would help. I laso have a 5sp installed, and at about 3100rpm I am > going 60mph. At 4000rpm, about 80mph. Stock motor. > Inflation is 50# front, 55 rear. Any less and the gas mileage suffers, > but the tires are rated to 70#. > Jon > > On 7/16/2015 8:00 AM, vw_van_fan_Mark wrote: >> Many standard load 215/65/16 tires are LI 98. >> There are XL versions at LI 102 as well. I have them on 2 of my vans. >> I think this size is one of the best for Vanagons. >> >> The 215/70/15 mentioned at rev/mile 744 must be a typo as it would be >> 215/70/16 tires that would fit that description. >> >> Mark >> >> Dennis Haynes wrote: >>> I do not know of any LT or XL rated tires in 215/65-15. With a load >>> index of 96 it is a marginal fitment especially for a loaded camper. >>> The higher speed rating does help as long as the tire is rated to >>> take the higher air pressures. >>>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »