

| Subject: | Re: Friday - couple of recent tool acquisitions. |
| From: | T Collins |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Sep 2015 12:59:07 -0400 |
Im the wrong person to ask about pronunciations :) But I do think that is correctly how I have heard it. Really cool machines! On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > Do you pronounce it "zee-nee-ah" ? > > Alistair > > > > > On Sep 4, 2015, at 9:48 AM, T Collins <tonycollin@gmail.com> wrote: > > Xenia Ohio,is not to far from Wilmington oh, the mecca of scirocco yearly > GTG's.... Industrial in Xenia for sure! :) > > t. > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Alistair Bell <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > >> In the last couple of weeks I've got a few interesting used tools that >> maybe some list members will be interested in. I've posted pics of a couple >> of them on my blog >> >> https://shufti.wordpress.com >> >> One is a very old metal shaper, R.A. Kelly of Xenia Ohio. Got for less >> than scrap iron prices and it doesn't seem to be in too bad shape. Has flat >> belt drive and someone sometime mounted a frame to the back side to mount >> electric motor. >> It is quite primitive compared to later shapers, but I bet it will cut >> fine. My idea is to use it to cut internal key ways. >> >> The other tool is a dividing head, made in Poland. Nothing at all found >> in the net for this machine except that the company is an arms makers. It >> does seem like a very close copy of a Cincinnati dividing head. It doesn't >> have the input shaft that would allow it to be coupled to the power feed of >> the milling machine table ( if it did it would be able to cut helixes and >> cams) but it does have the additional mechanism within the main dividing >> plate that, I believe, increases the number of possible divisions to >> 400,000. >> >> I've already used the dividing head on a couple of jobs and it really, >> really, cut down the machining time. >> >> This is all old school stuff, but still useful. The dividing head paid >> for itself on the first job. >> >> Alistair >> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »