

| Subject: | Re: Power & MPG Summer/Winter |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:56:05 -0600 |
MY '88 had three engine in the vans short life. The first was the factory engine when the vehicle was new, before I bought it ftom used car lot. When MY engine failed at about 89,000 miles ( burnt and failed piston) there was so much metal that went everywhere, that upon being offered "a deal" on another engine (the current one) I took it. Still running strong at 160,000 miles and 15 years. That made three engines at 89,000 on the van. Before the engine failed, I had always thought it to be the original engine. On teardown ( the one that failed) a yellow tag was discovered on it that said Remanufactured by Volkswagen of Canada. At that point I knew it was engine #2. The tear down was finished, an I opted to buy engine number 3 from Jim Connel at JIM'S AIRCOOLED in Leeds, Alabama, which is close by. He's building me another engine for another van as I write. So thats the summary of my engine episodes. John On Nov 10, 2015 20:14, "Dennis Haynes" <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> wrote: > So why did the 88 engine need a rebuild? Maybe you got lucky with the 85. > Seriously there are many variables that can affect the life of an engine > and to some extent there is a luck factor. Just one overheating event or > bad fuel or an engine management problem can change everything. The 1.9 and > 2.1 have the same size bearing journals. The 2.1 does have a longer stroke, > produces a bit more power so there is slightly more strain and the longer > stroke also causes an increase in the rod angle. The 2.1 does put more heat > into the oil thus the oil cooler. The 2.l also has a slightly improved main > bearing design with separate thrust plates for the flywheel side. The 2.1 > vans also have bit more load as most have power steering and air > conditioning. Anytime a 1.9 van comes my way needing an engine I try to get > a 2.1 in there. > > Dennis > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vanagon Mailing List [mailto:vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com] On Behalf > Of Dan N > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 9:00 PM > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > Subject: Re: Power & MPG Summer/Winter > > I have no idea ... except that my mechanic, a specialist in vanagon engine > said that the main crank is thicker and stronger > > I wish I know more... I had an 1985 with a 1.9 that went for 260K miles > before I sold it... > > I had a 1988 with a 2.1 that need a rebuild at 140K miles >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »