

| Subject: | Re: Sick sick sick of diesel Vanagon cooling problems |
| From: | Ralph Meyermann |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:11:11 -0600 |
Hopefully that's all it is! How do you like the turbo diesel? Besides the cooling issue anyway. On Dec 11, 2015 9:55 AM, "Jim Felder" <jim.felder@gmail.com> wrote: > I think so. Will be able to test this afternoon after a cool down. > > Jim > > > On Dec 11, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Ralph Meyermann <ralphmeyermann@GMAIL.COM> > wrote: > > > > Has this issue been resolved? > >> On Dec 10, 2015 3:53 PM, "vw_van_fan_Mark" <madvws@cox.net> wrote: > >> > >> Jim, I'm not saying that will fix all your problems but it is a place to > >> start. > >> > >> All Vanagon cooling systems use the top of the tank as the collection > >> point for air and then it gets pushed out through the cap over time. The > >> water pump is supposed to draw coolant from the bottom of the tank. The > >> way it is now the waterpump is drawing from the top of your tank, where > >> any air would be, the opposite of how VW intended. > >> > >> Finally, the vendor confusion is understandable. There are 2 very > >> different tank/hose configuration used in our diesel vans. When people > >> with the earlier 81/82 system need a new tank they commonly use the > >> 86-91 waterboxer tank since it matches up better with their 81/82 hoses > >> and slight mods. Not so for people with the rarer 83 and newer diesel > >> vans. Those people can use the 83-85 waterboxer tank and the 83+ diesel > >> hoses fit it fine, without mods. Most vendors will have dealt with the > >> more common 81/82 situation and thus may steer an 83 customer the wrong > >> way without knowing all the differences. > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >> Jim Felder wrote: > >> > >>> Glad to hear it, mark! I'd rather it be that than just about anything > >>> else. > >>> Thanks for catching. > >>> > >>> Jim > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:49 PM vw_van_fan_Mark <madvws@cox.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Jim, you have the wrong tank, I can see that in your photo. You need > the > >>>> other waterboxer tank (1.9) 84-85. It would work with that new lower > >>>> hose you thought was wrong. That new hose was actually right and > didn't > >>>> need the mod you made to it...... > >>> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »