

| Subject: | Re: Transmission swap problems: 86 tranny onto 83 engine. |
| From: | OlRivrRat |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:21:04 -0700 |
Be Sure that the ThrowOut/Release Bearing is Mounted on the Fork Properly &
that it is Fully Retracted ~ Check that the Gap Between Eng' & BellHousing is Even
All The Way Around ~ How Big is that Gap when You Get Stymied ? ~
ORR ~ DeanB
On 5 Jan , 2016, at 12:03 PM, Rick Cooper wrote:
> I'm trying to replace the manual transmission in an '83 Westy with one from
> an '86 tintop. Quite simply, I can't get the transmission to mate with the
> 1.9 engine; there is some mechanical obstruction. I think I'm far enough
> away that the input shaft has not even started into the clutch disc
> splines; the fresh grease I put on the input shaft has not been disturbed.
>
> I don't think its an incompatible parts issue since they appear identical.
> The transmissions are both stamped 091 301 103D, the pressure plates are
> marked "Sachs Typ M228" and the clutch discs are both Sachs and measure
> 228mm in diameter. (The clutch kit from the 1983 is nearly new; the PO
> told me it had been recently replaced and I was hoping to re-use it.) The
> input shafts appear identical; the clutch disks from both will slide onto
> either one of them.
>
> Why was I replacing the transmission? Gearing problems -- usually
> impossible to shift into first from neutral; usually had to get van moving
> in 2nd and then downshift to 1st. Also issues shifting from 2nd to 3rd.
> It seemed less expensive to swap in a good used transmission than to have
> that one rebuilt.
>
> Can anyone suggest what the problem might be? (I haven't done many
> engine/tranny swaps, but I'm experiencing deja vu. I once tried to put the
> engine from an '88 Chev S10 into a 1991 Chev S10. Same problem; could not
> get the engine to engage with the 91 transmission's input shaft. Turns out
> that GM had changed the input shaft size in the intervening years.)
>
> Thanks, RickHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »