

| Subject: | Re: Friday: New VW Engine--it's Miller (cycle) time |
| From: | James |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2016 22:46:13 -0400 |
It's a conversion typo by someone not reading the text - the text talks about an improvement in fuel economy of one litre per 100 km - example, going from 6 litres per 100 km to 5 litres per 100 km - but whoever was adding the conversion to MPG in that article didn't read the 'while also improving fuel economy by 1 l/100 km' as a change and not an absolute, and instead just translated 1L/100 km into MPG - and 1L/100 km is indeed 235 MPG. If the 6L/100 km system is unfamiliar, here's an example - if the old fuel economy rating was 6 l/100 km, and the new is 5 L/100 km, then we've gone from 39.4 mpg to 47.3 mpg. James Metrified Ottawa, ON (Where I'm glad that if my '91 Weekender AT gets 14L/100 km on highway runs.) > Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:04:15 +0000 > From: jim.felder@GMAIL.COM > Subject: Re: Friday: New VW Engine--it's Miller (cycle) time > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > I saw that to and attributed it to a typo. If not, it would appear in a lot > bigger news outlets than Gizmag. > > Jim > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:58 AM Brent Weide <brent.weide@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I may not be reading it properly but does that really claim 235 mpg?? > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:40 AM, David McNeely <davmcneely40@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > The Mazda engine could never meet emissions standards, and was dropped, > > > iirc. True of their earlier rotary engine as well. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Alistair Bel <albell@shaw.ca> wrote: > > > > > > > VW , where our heads are firmly buried in the sand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/28/vw-and-shell-try-to-block-eu-push-for-cleaner-cars > > > > > > > > > > > > And didn't Mazda sell a Miller cycle engine in a couple of models way > > > back > > > > in the nineties? > > > > > > > > Alistair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 29, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Jim Felder <jim.felder@GMAIL.COM> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From Gizmag.com today: > > > > > > > > > > Manufacturers are leaving no stone unturned in the quest to improve > > the > > > > > efficiency of their internal combustion engines. Just this week, > > we've > > > > seen > > > > > a fastidiously engineered diesel engine > > > > > <http://www.gizmag.com/ford-ecoblue-diesel-engine/43016/> from Ford > > > > > and a camless > > > > > engine <http://www.gizmag.com/qoros-qamfree-camless-engine/43045/> > > > from > > > > > Qoros. Now Volkswagen, no stranger to doing whatever it takes to > > lower > > > > > consumption (figures), has joined the party by releasing a 1.5-liter > > > > Miller > > > > > Cycle < > > > > http://www.gizmag.com/audi-high-efficiency-two-liter-engine/37428/> > > > > > engine > > > > > tasked with improving fuel consumption and increasing low-down > > torque. > > > > > > > > > > Volkswagen's engineers say there are a number of improvements that > > come > > > > > courtesy of the improved thermodynamic efficiency associated with > > > Miller > > > > > Cycle engines. An increase in the geometric compression ratio has, > > > > > according to VW, allowed for improved efficiency in the load range > > most > > > > > customers will actually use, while the final compression temperature > > > has > > > > > been lowered through early closing of the intake valve and the > > > expansion > > > > > cooling that brings. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to these improvements, VW claims its new engine offers up peak > > > > > torque from just 1,300 rpm, while also improving fuel economy by 1 > > > l/100 > > > > km > > > > > (235 US MPG) compared to the current 1.5-liter TSI engine. > > > > > > > > > > Working tandem with these big changes to the combustion cycle are a > > > > number > > > > > of small changes that, when combined, contribute to the longevity and > > > > > efficiency of the engine. On the 110 kW (148 hp) version of the > > engine, > > > > the > > > > > cylinder liners are coated with an atmospheric plasma spray to cut > > down > > > > on > > > > > friction, improve heat dissipation and improve corrosion resistance. > > > > > > > > > > The engine's cooling system has also come under the microscope, and > > now > > > > > will make sure the water in the crankcase and engine remains > > stationary > > > > > while the car is warming up. As well as cutting the amount of time > > > spent > > > > > without the engine operating at ideal temperature, VW says the system > > > > helps > > > > > warm the cabin more quickly on cold mornings. > > > > > > > > > > Although it's usually used on high end, big displacement engines, VW > > > has > > > > > even fitted cylinder deactivation to the new engine, allowing it to > > run > > > > as > > > > > a two-cylinder under light loads. > > > > > > > > > > An increasing injection pressure 350 bar has improved the mixture > > > > formation > > > > > in the engine, which should also lead to lower particulate emissions. > > > > > > > > > > Interestingly, the release makes it very clear the efficiency and > > > > emissions > > > > > improvements are unlikely to show up under test cycle conditions, but > > > > > argues that they're likely to have a "distinct impact on the > > customer's > > > > > everyday driving." > > > > > > > > > > The new four-cylinder engine will find its way into showrooms later > > > this > > > > > year in 96 kW (129 hp) and 110 kW (148 hp) guises. It's currently on > > > show > > > > > at the Vienna Motor Symposium. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Brent Weide > > Portland, Oregon > > www.weidefamily.net/vanagon/ > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »