

| Subject: | Re: hankook ra-08 copies |
| From: | Don Hanson |
| Date: | Sat, 7 May 2016 08:22:43 -0700 |
"A real tire"?... Like perhaps 50% of the still new looking used Michelin tires I've seen come my way recently? <(Sarcastic) With the tread bulges and separations? I've given up on Michelin.. I don't advocate the Go Form brand or any particular tire from them, just passing on my own experience with these, in answer to a query. DH On May 7, 2016 7:43 AM, "Jon VonOhlsen" <jondvo@gmail.com> wrote: > The GoForm G520 185 or 195r14 tire has a load index of 86(195) or 88(185), > or a capacity of about 1250#. I'll stick with a real tire...unless there is > some other version from Tires Easy. > Jon > > > On 5/7/2016 8:23 AM, Don Hanson wrote: > >> I, too, was skeptical when I bought a pair of these to make it home from >> the desert one spring...being short of cash, though, I had no choice. >> >> They've surprised me by consistently performing just as well as the >> higher priced tires they claim to have copied... Thanks to Ron for taking >> the time to look up the back round info. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:41 AM, The Bus Depot <vanagon@busdepot.com> >> wrote: >> >> what is the name and where can you >>>> get the chinese copies of the hankook tires? >>>> Go Form >>>> >>> I looked into this claim after it was repeated here several times (by the >>> same individual, I believe). I also spoke to Hankook about it. The >>> GoForms >>> come from a company called Qingdao Gloryred International Trade Company, >>> whose advertising headline is trade publications is (not kidding) "Sell >>> cheap tyre." Qingdao Gloryred has no affiliation whatsoever with >>> Hankook. >>> Hankook has not shared any technology with them or licensed any >>> technology >>> to them. Their claim of using "Hankook technology" is based solely on >>> the >>> fact that their technical engineer used to work for Hankook. Given that >>> employees often change jobs, by that standard almost any company could >>> claim a connection to any other company. It is not uncommon for >>> off-brand >>> Chinese companies to make false claims of affiliation with or endorsement >>> by name brands in order to lend legitimacy to their products. For example >>> there are several other off-brand Chinese companies that claim to use >>> "Michelin technology" but have no actual connection with Michelin. Laws >>> against false advertising are not the same in China. Interestingly, >>> these >>> companies don't make those claims in the U.S., where they would be forced >>> to retract them immediately. >>> >>> Consumer Reports tested several off-brand Chinese tires (although not >>> GoForms) a couple of years ago and found that they all performed at the >>> absolute bottom of the pack for safety and for lifespan, even though some >>> had copied the tread pattern of better known tires. They interviewed >>> Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Auto Safety, who >>> explained this disparity by pointing out that “the composition of the >>> tire >>> is more important than the mold.” In other words you can make the tread >>> look the same cosmetically, but if the rubber compound is different, >>> it's a >>> different tire. The tires they checked were also "iffy" in other ways, >>> such >>> as using counterfeit date codes on the sidewall. Consumer Reports - >>> whose >>> goal is to find bargains and "best buys" - concluded by advising its >>> readers to stick with the name brands, which were actually better >>> bargains >>> in the long run even just based on treadwear alone. >>> >>> I have not tried the GoForm tire so I can't comment on it specifically. >>> For all I know it may be a decent cheap tire on its own merits. But it >>> has >>> no more connection to a Hankook RA08 than any other cheap Chinese tires >>> does, except perhaps skin-deep. >>> >>> Ron Salmon >>> The Bus Depot, Inc. >>> www.busdepot.com >>> >>> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »