

| Subject: | Re: Tires! 15" or 14"? |
| From: | Larry Chase |
| Date: | Mon, 2 May 2016 10:05:46 -0500 |
Ron, Most excellent explanation. larry www.roadhaus.com > On May 2, 2016, at 7:43 AM, The Bus Depot <vanagon@BUSDEPOT.COM> wrote: > >> I thought that it would be Intuitively Obvious To The >> Most Casual Observer that I was Making Reference >> to SideWall Stiffness, Not Load/Weight Recommendations >> I thought that it would be Intuitively Obvious To The >> Most Casual Observer that I was Making Reference to >> SideWall Stiffness, Not Load/Weight Recommendations, >> but I Apparently Thought Wrong ~ So Again to Be Clear >> For You Ron ~ My Point Was -->> >> As SideWall >> height is Reduced the Need for Stiff SideWalls Also >> Reduces << > > Your initial point regarded, in your words, "the Tire Spec's that they did > to the Vanagon." There is no such thing as Vanagon "tire specs" for > "SideWall Stiffness." In fact there is no such spec in the entire tire > industry. The spec is for load capacity. Load capacity is in turn increased > by increasing sidewall stiffness (all other things being equal). VW did not > lower the load capacity requirements when they moved from 14" to 15" and > then to 16" tires. Therefore they did not lower the spec for "sidewall > stiffness." > > Contrary to your assertion, they also did not lower the load capacity when > they moved to lower profile (reduced sidewall height) tires. The stock 14" > Vanagon tire has a 6" sidewall. The stock 16" Eurovan tire has a 5.3" > sidewall. Despite its lower sidewall height, the Eurovan's tire load > capacity requirement actually INCREASED. (The increase itself might be > attributed to the slight increase in curb weight - 750 lbs - but even if > adjusted for that, it roughly stayed the same, it did not decrease.) So no, > reducing the sidewall height does NOT reduce the required tire load > capacity. To your point, it may change how the tire manufacturer gets these > (maybe they would need less "sidewall stiffness," this unquantifiable > parameter you mention, to achieve the same load rating if there is less > sidewall), but even if it did, so what? That's an unmeasurable value that > has no bearing on choosing tires. The only spec that matters (or exists) is > the tire's actual load capacity, which is the bottom line, whether they > achieved it by sidewall height, sidewall stiffness, "modern technology," or > magic. > > So to summarize, you can change "SideWall height" and "SideWall Stiffness" > all you want but it doesn't change the VW van's tire load capacity > requirement one bit. If the van called for tires rated at 1600 lbs load > capacity before, and you switch to tires with different rim sizes or > sidewall height, you still need a tire rated at 1600 lbs. (Not according to > me, but according to the only real experts that have ever weighed in on this > - Volkswagen themselves, and the National Highway Safety Administration.) > That is the inconvenient yet incontrovertible fact that some retailers try > so hard to talk around, to justify hawking tires that don't meet those > specs. (And that some Vanagon owners try so hard to talk around to justify > purchasing such tires.) > > So if you choose to run tires that VW says are underrated, own that choice. > It's your van and your life, and you can justify it any way that makes you > happy. But no amount of justification will change the fact - not opinion - > that you are running tires that do not meet the safety standards set by the > people who engineered your vehicle. > > Again - <http://www.busdepot.com/details/tires/> > > Ron Salmon > The Bus Depot, Inc. > www.busdepot.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »