

| Subject: | Re: 2.1L engine won't fire |
| From: | John Rodgers |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Mar 2017 06:21:05 -0500 |
David, thanks for the suggestions. Will follow through! John On Mar 23, 2017 05:38, "David Beierl" <dbeierl@attglobal.net> wrote: > Get someone to crank while you rap sharply a few times on suspect ECU with > screwdriver handle. Any signs of life, ECU ignition drive and likely bad > solder cured by reflowing. > > Otherwise swap 'em back, problem either stays with ECU or stays with van. > That will save you a lot of confusion going forward. If they both run > after stop, ECU plug contact or harness intermittent or ECU bad ignition > driver as above. In that case begin testing by rapping the suspect with a > screwdriver handle to see if engine stops. > > Adding a foot (with super extra good, wonderful, very fine connections) to > the ECU ground wire will make things easier as will removing the ECUs from > the cover plates -- they're just mechanical protection. At one time I > thought that you must not ground the heat sink fins on some variation of > the ECU, but I'm lately convinced otherwise. I was right before or I am > now, your bet. > > Yrs, > d > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:19 AM, John Rodgers <jrodgers113@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It's weird. It's worked just fine for over two years since being modified. >> Then suddenly this malfunction. And with no warning symtoms of any kind >> that I could detect. My ECU MONITOR shows fuel injector pulse, hall sender >> pulse, and normally, the coil pulse. Now the coil light is on, but it does >> not pulse as it should when working properly. Will check it out sometime >> today. On a WBX 2.1, there are ECU's from different companies, but I >> surmise they all perform the same. No performance differences across the >> board and should be interchangeable from one Van/2.1L to another. >> >> John >> >> On Mar 23, 2017 01:46, "OlRivrRat" <OlRivrRat@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> > Sounds as if Your Modified ECU May Have A Bug In It ~ >> > >> > >> > On 22 Mar , 2017, at 11:56 PM, John Rodgers wrote: >> > >> > No. Swapping in the first place was a pretty good task for an old >> crippled >> > guy. The reason for the swap in the first place was that the ECU in the >> > '88 GL was modified to use the Shoebox Monitor, which is a great little >> > trouble shooting tool. I needed it for tuning, It allows you to even >> drive >> > the van while simultaneously getting engine performance readouts. At >> this >> > point, I have plugged in the monitor, and I'm getting an indication >> there >> > is no coil pulse. This happened on the '88 GL one time before. One >> minute >> > it ran fine, on the next startup a few minutes later thevcoil was dead. >> > There was no warning, it just quit. I'll check it out when it gets >> daylight! >> > >> > John >> > >> > On Mar 22, 2017 22:33, "OlRivrRat" <OlRivrRat@comcast.net> wrote: >> > >> >> Kinda Curious here about Why You Switched these ECUs in the 1st >> >> place & Why >> >> >> >> You Did Not Immediately Switch Them Back to see if the Issue would go >> >> away ~ >> >> >> >> ORR ~ DeanB >> >> >> >> On 22 Mar , 2017, at 5:14 PM, John Rodgers wrote: >> >> >> >> > Two vans, both running, parked side by side. A carat, and an '88 GL. >> >> > SWAPPED ECU's - '88 GL starts, runs! Carat won't even fire! ECU swap >> was >> >> > all that was done. Verifide ground and connection were good. >> >> > >> >> > What say "the list"? >> >> > >> >> > John >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »