

| Subject: | Re: Fri: Vanagon Gentrification |
| From: | kenneth wilford (Van-Again) |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Sep 2017 14:16:56 -0400 |
Abel, I appreciate your input on this one. I have found that if you have a full Westy another great choice is Progressive Insurance. You have to insure it as an RV but the insurance for a year in NJ is under $400. You can do an agreed value and all they require for it to be considered an RV is that it has a permanently mounted stove or sink. Also for just a few more dollars a year you can get their break down/towing coverage which I have found to be very good. No need for AAA membership and it is I think around $30 extra a year. Any one else want to chime in? Ken On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Abel Longoria <houstonphotog@gmail.com> wrote: > I spoke to no less than 13 companies when looking for insurance... I wanted > 3 things. > > 1. Unlimited annual miles > 2. Ability to camp in vehicle > 3. Agreed Value policy based on appraisal > > I went through State Farm, insured as an RV.. > > They gave me all 3 items I wanted and they accepted the Value > Opinion/Appraisal that I got from Gowesty for $250 found here: > > http://www.gowesty.com/product-details.php?id=23894 > > I pay about $63 a month for the policy and its agreed value is $40,000. > > A lot of classic car insurances limit you to like 1,000 miles a year. Yea > that doesn't work for me. Sure some people try to lie about their mileage > but I didn't want to give any insurance company a loop hole to get out of > covering my van in case of a totaled incident. I'd rather have all of my > ducks in a row and be on the up and up so if it does happen they can't > wiggle their way out of paying up. Some insurance companies don't allow you > to camp in the vehicle. Another deal breaker for me. > > Biggest stickler to be considered an RV was the fact that the vehicle has a > toilet in it. I have a Thetford marine toilet, Insurance company states > that > all it needed. I explained it was not a permanent fixture but a floating > one and she said their policy doesnt state it needs to be fixed/mounted. So > I am good. > > Anyways... This is the info I've found and worked on for months... > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:05 PM, David McNeely <davmcneely40@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Every time I have discussed "agreed value" insurance with an agent or > > company representative the upshot has been that I can have unrestricted > use > > of my vehicle, with maximum payout in case of an accident being the > lesser > > of market value (defined by the company) or cost to repair (again defined > > by the company), or I can have "agreed value" insurance but with greatly > > restricted use. One unacceptable restriction is that it can only be > driven > > on paved roads. Another is that it cannot be driven more than a certain > > number of miles per year, and then only for explicit purposes. > > > > I have found no company that would sell me a policy with an "agreed > value" > > without those restrictions. > > > > If you know how to get "agreed value" insurance without the restrictions > on > > use, please let us all know. > > > > And please don't say that one can get "stated value" insurance and avoid > > the restrictions. I have discussed stated value insurance, and > discovered > > that the companies will be happy to sell you a policy with a "stated > > value," but that the coverage is still for the lesser of current market > > value or cost to repair (again defined by the company), stated value not > > withstanding. All "stated value" means is that you told the company that > > you believe the vehicle to be worth that amount. > > > > mcneely > > > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:01 AM, kenneth wilford (Van-Again) < > > kenwilfy@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > That is why you want to have them fully insured with "agreed value" > > > insurance so that if something like this happens you get all of the > money > > > you need to buy another one and you don't have to worry about > accidents. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Don Hanson <dhanson928@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I just heard from a Vanagon acquaintance who sold his Westie for > ~$20k. > > > > He narrowly avoiding a serious smashup that would have totalled it. > > > > Someone offered the big bucks and he decided to move to a different > > van > > > > and no longer risk using his very valuable Vanagon like he always > > has... > > > > Yes, the Vanagons are "in"... kiss em goodbye as cheap utility > > > daily > > > > drivers... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Ken Wilford > > > John 3:16 > > > www.vanagain.com > > > > > > -- Thanks, Ken Wilford John 3:16 www.vanagain.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »