

| Subject: | Re: replacing front brake hoses (WAS Re: upgrading brakes in 83.5) |
| From: | kenneth wilford (Van-Again) |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:09:31 -0400 |
I would spray the metal connections down with either PB Blaster or WD-40 a few days before you are getting ready to do the work. Usually this will help loosen things up before you begin to do the work. If you can find a line wrench in 11mm that would also give you the best chance of not wrecking the fittings. Ken On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:59 PM pickle vanagon <greenvanagon@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for all the responses! > > It looks like I just had rusty rotors. > > I'm considering replacing the rubber brake lines at the same time as a > change the rotors, however, I have heard these can be very hard to remove. > > Any tips on this? Is it likely to turn an otherwise smooth job into a big > headache? > > Also, I guess it means I would lose a lot of brake fluid. Would I have to > bleed the rear brakes (ore even also the clutch) if I remove those front > hoses? > -Wes > > > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:12 PM, pickle vanagon <greenvanagon@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Pickle's stopping power has long been on my list of things to address. > > > > We have 16" CLK wheels so a bigger brake kit seems like a natural idea. > > But are late model front spindles in good condition readily obtainable? > > > > Basically here is what I'm considering: > > 1) Overhaul the rear brakes, hope for an improvement there > > 2) Rear disc brakes (i.e., the smallcar or burley kits) > > 3) somehow get some late model spindles and do the big brakes up front, > in > > addition to either 1) or 2). > > > > Maybe I am being naive, but coming from an 83.5, #2 seems like it may > have > > a better ratio of effectiveness to hastle than #3. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > -Wes > > > > > -- Thanks, Ken Wilford John 3:16 www.vanagain.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »