

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Diesel Advice |
| From: | Stephen Engel |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:06:45 -0400 |
I dare say even the VW Diesel cars (Rabbit, Dasher, Jetta) of that era were dangerously slow. I think they used the same engine or a variant very close to the Vanagon’s.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 29, 2019, at 3:51 PM, Dan N <dn92610@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> in general Diesel engine in that era ('80/'90) are gutless no matter the
> brand, turbo or not. I used to have a Peugeot 604 2.5L Turbo Diesel and
> it's gutless, slow and smoky.., which means a 1.6 is very slow turbo or
> not... specially in a heavy vanagon. A modern 1.9Tdi is better but
> still....
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:20 AM Ralph Meyermann <ralphmeyermann@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> My 82 diesel was a gutless turtle until I swapped in an AAZ TD 1.9l then an
>> ahu M-tdi 1.9 and now improving the gearing. Relatively simple to work on.
>> Less prone for issues dealing with electronic fuel injection/coolant leaks.
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 9:25 AM Chris S <szpejankowski@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, List.
>>>
>>> My son is selling his daily driver 76 Beetle and looking to upgrade to a
>>> Vanagon. He does not care about going fast or A/C.
>>>
>>> What is your advice regarding a 1.6 NA diesel passenger Vanagon? I found
>>> o e such clean example in Mew Jersey:
>>>
>>> https://www.thesamba.com/vw/classifieds/detail.php?id=2268363
>>>
>>> Chris in Atlanta.
>>>
>>> Wysłane z iPhone'a
>>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »