

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Reliability & Philosophy |
| From: | Jim. Felder |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Jul 2019 14:41:50 -0500 |
One thing Pirsig never factored in was the spiraling disaster that is rebuilt assemblies. Tomorrow I will pay $140 for a rebuilt alternator for my diesel Vanagon. The problem is that I paid one of the list vendors that much for the item originally—exactly 11,678 miles ago, a Bosch Premium Rebuild. When you are on the wrong end of the life cycle curve on starters and alternators, preventive maintenance becomes catch-and-release. As soon as you install the thing, start looking for the next one. Jim > > On Jul 1, 2019 at 10:37 AM, <Jack Elliott (mailto:pdaxe2gto@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > I just see my van as entropy in action. Also an engineer (though > electrical, not mechanical) I view it as a system of parts that are > imperfect, a kludge of things that will work for a while. It's gonna break. > In a big way, or a small way, the oncoming heat death of the universe makes > itself known. I stay alert for signs of weirdness and try to understand > them, see if they are significant or not, and address them accordingly to > the best of these guesses and the best of my ability. I rely on the > knowledge of others whenever I can. Adding a passenger, a SO for example, > who does not share my willingness to accept the inevitable, will greatly > reduce the sometimes pleasurable aspect of dealing with a breakdown and > solving the problem creatively. IOW, if getting someplace on time is > critical, if there are others with me that will not get a kick out of being > stuck somewhere because an oil filter blew off (it happened to me due to my > ignorance of filter threads, another story), then it's gonna have a Bad > Time. Masochism in action? To paraphrase my son, "any d*****bag with a > credit card can have a reliable car." Sometimes just getting somewhere > without trouble is in itself accomplishment enough. > > That, plus people think these vehicles are totally cool and wish they could > get one. > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM kenneth wilford (Van-Again) < > kenwilfy@comcast.net> wrote: > > > I look at the van as a never ending restoration project. You start with > > the things that affect your safety and reliability first like brakes, > > steering, suspension, the engine, the transmission. Once these have been > > inspected and repaired, then you can move on to creature comforts like AC > > and cosmetics. The problem is most folks focus on the creature comforts > > and cosmetics first and expect the mechanicals will be fine as long as the > > van looks good (new paint or wheels), and has a great sounding radio (I > > guess it is fun to rock out while you wait for the tow truck). > > > > Also one of my customers chants this mantra, "Don't let perfection get in > > the way of good enough." You have to know when to say when on any > > project. If you are seeking perfection you will never find it. But if you > > are seeking functionality and safety you should find it in enough measure > > to feel confident in your Vanagon. I use Progressive insurance which > > includes a nice towing and roadside assistance plan, which I think every > > car owner should have no matter what they are driving. > > > > That is about it. I know the aircraft mechanic, engineer, etc. tends to > > over analyze and over think the repairs or restoration of the van. Usually > > this leads to lots of great plans, ripping everything apart to do a > > "proper" restoration, and then abandoning the project when life gets in the > > way. Avoid this. Instead, do the basics, get it running and safe, and > > then enjoy it for the summer or two before doing the "full monty" on it. > > That way you can decide if you really want to do that, or if you want to > > sell it to someone else, or if you are "gasp" satisfied with the van even > > with the quirks and imperfections. Some of them came from the factory... > > > > Ken > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:28 AM Alex MeVay <alex@mevay.org> wrote: > > > > > I've also been interested in exploring this, and I think Richard S > > > gave some great points. > > > > > > I'm 5 years into my Vanagon, and it's given me the highest highs and > > > lowest lows of any vehicle I've owned. Some of the recent trip > > > reports have done a good job capturing the highs. As for the lows: > > > after endless weekends and evenings of work, sitting there staring at > > > a half-busted van and a to-do list that never gets any shorter... Rod > > > sticking through the oil pan (I-4) one day before your long-planned > > > trip down the CA coast with your SO... You know the routine. > > > > > > At first, I approached the van like I would my other projects: as an > > > engineer (my day job). I would think through each repair and upgrade > > > to make sure it would last at least 1,000 years (or say at least 30), > > > and add to the todo list anything that might ever fail ever. This was > > > a recipe for negative thoughts and feelings about the van. I > > > struggled, even to the point of having impure thoughts about > > > Sprinters. At some point, I stumbled across this article, which I > > > found extremely helpful: > > > > > > https://worldpowersystems.com/PROJECTS/wabiTekSabi/index.html > > > > > > Among other points, it encourages thinking about objects as processes > > > or situations, not perfected Platonic ideals. Instead of thinking > > > about the van as an object I have thus far failed to perfect, it's > > > better to think about the process and context: the exchange of driving > > > the van, doing maintenance. A van by itself is meaningless...add a > > > driver, a 2-lane road, and that exchange of energy, and now you're > > > going somewhere. Instead of asking myself, "Is it perfect?", I > > > learned to ask, "Will it get me to the desert and back in relative > > > safety and comfort?" This is a much lower standard, but it gets more > > > to the heart of why I think we all do this. It acknowledges that, > > > even before you tighten that last bolt, the process of decay and > > > failure has started. All is flux, but that's OK. > > > > > > > > > Turning to more concrete matters, I think what Richard said about your > > > eyes and seat being the OBD hits the nail on the head. Being > > > mercilessly vigilant about understanding every creak, drip, vibration, > > > and smell is the best way to avoid big problems. You don't need to > > > fix it all, but I feel you need to understand it. For every issue or > > > warning sign, I ask: > > > > > > What is the root cause? > > > > > > How bad is this if it fails? (annoyance, or end of trip?) > > > > > > Is it likely to fail all at once, or slowly get worse? (Will I have > > > some warning that a repair is required?) > > > > > > Is there a possibility of cascading failure? (i.e., bad engine > > > mount->trashed exhaust) > > > > > > Can it be repaired in the field? > > > > > > Running through these questions for each issue helps me prioritize > > > repairs and understand the risks I am taking (or lack thereof) each > > > time I head out on a trip. > > > > > > What other philosophies or mind-tricks have helped you enjoy Vanagon > > > ownership, or simply get out and back safely? > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:32 PM Richard Smith <smirby@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On reliability: > > > > > > > > I commend everyone who works on reliability, and I think it is > > something > > > we should all be mindful of. Without the "RE" you have a liability. __ > > > > > > > > On the "my wife/husband hates my van because it is unreliable" theme, I > > > like to approach that problem from three directions: > > > > > > > > 1. Manage expectations. I start every (longer) trip with a reminder > > that > > > we could get towed, and that it shouldn't be seen as a disaster. This may > > > appease the karma gods - I haven't been towed yet - but it also sets the > > > tone for whatever calamity arises. > > > > > > > > 2. Live in the moment. If our cars didn't falter from time to time, and > > > we drifted along in uncaring bliss, would get get to meet those > > exceptional > > > people who rise to the occasion? Every breakdown that I have had has been > > > just as interesting as the rest of the trip. > > > > > > > > 3. Invest in your ride. Do the things that need doing, when they need > > > it. Replace the fuel lines. Make sure the brakes, tires, suspension are > > all > > > in good condition before you set out. This won't make it never break > > down, > > > but it will remove some of the failure points. We don't have a lot of > > > sensors telling us what is wrong, so your ears (and seat) are your "OBD" > > > system. > > > > > > > > We often mistake the reliability that we see in others' vehicles for a > > > completely trouble-free experience. They, too, have had their share of > > > breakdowns, its just that we don't see them. In my time owning Vanagons > > > (and a '73 bus before that), it has been no worse than lots of other > > cars, > > > and better than many. > > > > > > > > For most of us, our vanagon is >30 years old. This carries with it a > > > weighty responsibility in maintenance but also the need to embrace the > > > uncertainty that it brings with it. > > > > > > > > Despite all this, it remains a joy to own, and if that comes with a > > > frisson of excitement because of the chance of breakdown, I'll take it. > > Not > > > for everyone, to be sure, but that's how I am dealing with it. > > > > > > > > ...r > > > > > > > > On 2019-06-30, 5:37 PM, "Vanagon Mailing List on behalf of Richard > > > Koerner" <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com on behalf of rjkinpb@SBCGLOBAL.NET> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Which brings me to a last point. A few months ago someone > > mentioned > > > reliability as their main goal with their Westy. I am very interested in > > > ideas about reliability that anyone might share. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Ken Wilford > > John 3:16 > > www.vanagain.com > > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »